Associations with Non-Persistence with Intra-Vitreal Therapy for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration at 24 Months

Abstract

Aims: The aim of the study was to investigate non-persistence with treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (NvAMD) before day 720 (24 months) after initiation, explore associations with baseline characteristics and variation between sites. Methods: Anonymised demographic and clinical data were extracted from electronic medical records at treating National Health Service (NHS) Trusts for NvAMD eyes starting intra-vitreal therapy from 2017 to 2018. Time to non-persistence with treatment, defined as no recorded attendance for either monitoring or treatment for a period ≥6 months, was visualised with a Kaplan-Meier survival plot. Associations with treatment non-persistence were investigated using a Cox proportional hazards model. Results: Analysis included 7,970 eyes of 7,112 patients treated at 13 NHS trusts. Censoring deaths and those eyes in which treatment was stopped permanently, the Kaplan-Meier analyses demonstrated survival figures of 77.7% for persistence with treatment to day 360 and 71.8% to day 720. Hazard ratios for non-persistence with treatment were reduced at 10 sites, relative to the reference, with first-treated eye status and with baseline acuity worse than or equal to LogMAR 1.0. Hazard ratios increased with younger age, in the presence of other ocular co-morbidities and with baseline acuity better than or equal to LogMAR 0.5. After an episode of non-persistence, visual acuity decreased by at least 0.1 and 0.3 LogMAR in 39% and 18% of eyes, respectively. Conclusions: Non-persistence with treatment was common, especially in the first year of treatment, and was often associated with a decrease in visual acuity. Treatment site, baseline visual acuity, and age were the strongest predictors of treatment non-persistence before day 720. Understanding and addressing reasons for non-persistence are important to ensure that effective but expensive treatments are used cost-effectively and to maintain acuity. Variation in non-persistence between sites, even after adjustment for other variables, suggests that local factors in treatment provision may be particularly important.