Abstract

IntroductionA reliable and accurate estimate of the percentage and distribution of adipose tissue in the human body is essential for evaluating the risk of developing chronic and noncommunicable diseases. A precise and differentiated method, which at the same time is fast, noninvasive, and straightforward to perform, would, therefore, be desirable. We sought a new approach to this research area by linking a person’s relative body fat with their body surface’s areal roughness characteristics.Materials and methodsFor this feasibility study, we compared areal surface roughness characteristics, assessed from 3D photonic full-body scans of 76 Swiss young men, and compared the results with body impedance-based estimates of relative body fat. We developed an innovative method for characterizing the areal surface roughness distribution of a person’s entire body, in a similar approach as it is currently used in geoscience or material science applications. We then performed a statistical analysis using different linear and stepwise regression models.ResultsIn a stepwise regression analysis of areal surface roughness frequency tables, a combination of standard deviation, interquartile range, and mode showed the best association with relative body fat (R2 = 0.55, p < 0.0001). The best results were achieved by calculating the arithmetic mean height, capable of explaining up to three-quarters of the variance in relative body fat (R2 = 0.74, p < 0.001).Discussion and conclusionThis study shows that areal surface roughness characteristics assessed from 3D photonic whole-body scans associate well with relative body fat, therefore representing a viable new approach to improve current 3D scanner-based methods for determining body composition and obesity-associated health risks. Further investigations may validate our method with other data or provide a more detailed understanding of the relation between the body’s areal surface characteristics and adipose tissue distribution by including larger and more diverse populations or focusing on particular body segments.

Highlights

  • A reliable and accurate estimate of the percentage and distribution of adipose tissue in the human body is essential for evaluating the risk of developing chronic and noncommunicable diseases

  • Linear regressions showed that BMI was able to explain a high share of the variability in %BF (R2 = 0.81, p < 0.001), the same applied for WC (R2 = 0.77, p < 0.001)

  • The location of the mode in the most obese participant was in a lower class (Class 10, using R2, radius = 2 cm) compared to the peaks of the slimmest participant (Class 16) or the most muscular participant (Class 12), i.e., most surface points of the obese participants were located within smoother surface areas

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A reliable and accurate estimate of the percentage and distribution of adipose tissue in the human body is essential for evaluating the risk of developing chronic and noncommunicable diseases. Materials and methods For this feasibility study, we compared areal surface roughness characteristics, assessed from 3D photonic full-body scans of 76 Swiss young men, and compared the results with body impedance-based estimates of relative body fat. We developed an innovative method for characterizing the areal surface roughness distribution of a person’s entire body, in a similar approach as it is currently used in geoscience or material science applications. The use of 3D photonic body scans (BS) to assess body shape in epidemiologic studies and for daily fitness tracking is on the rise, thanks to developments in equipment and measurement methods that provide fast, reproducible, and increasingly accurate results [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the gold standard for assessing body composition and Associations between relative body fat and areal body surface roughness characteristics in 3D photonic. Several recent studies aimed to bridge this gap between volume, surface, and distribution of adipose tissue [14, 15], e.g., using multimodality registration of DXA data with 3D body surface scans [16], published data only included six individuals

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call