Abstract

Taste preferences guide food choices and dietary behaviours, yet few studies have shown a relationship between sweet and savoury taste preference and differences in dietary intakes or energy consumed from different “taste clusters”. We investigated differences in psycho-hedonic responses to sweet and savoury tastes and their association with energy intake, proportion of energy from macronutrients and energy intake from different “taste clusters”. In addition, we evaluated correspondence between two methods to classify “sweet-liker” status and the overlap between sweet and savoury taste preferences. Psycho-hedonic responses to sweet and savoury tastes of female participants (n = 66) were captured via staircase paired preference and the “sweet-liker phenotype” classification method. Quantitative dietary energy and macronutrient intakes were measured using three-day food diary, and the relative contributions of specific taste clusters to energy intake were derived for each participant. All participants completed anthropometric assessments measuring body mass index (BMI) and adiposity. Results showed no association between sweet and savoury preferences with dietary energy or macronutrient intakes, though there was a trend towards higher sweet food consumption among “sweet-likers”. A higher preference for savouriness was not associated with differences in daily energy intake, energy intake from protein, BMI or adiposity levels. There was little overlap in sweet and savoury preferences, suggesting a bi-modal split in taste preferences. “Sweet-likers” preferred a higher mean sucrose concentration than sweet “dislikers” (p < 0.001) indicating agreement between the two approaches. Future studies should consider comparing taste-liker differences using food choice tasks to address the current gap between taste preference measures and actual dietary behaviours.

Highlights

  • Food choices and intake behaviours are guided by our preferences, and these preferences are thought to inform our habitual dietary behaviour [1]

  • (p < 0.001), sucrose concentration of 21.6% w/v compared to those not classified as sweet likers confirming good agreement between the sweet-liker phenotypephenotype method and a preference for higher (p < 0.001), confirming good agreement between the sweet-liker method and a preference sucrose concentrations among sweet likerssweet

  • We explored whether differences in liking for a taste was associated with differences in dietary energy intake, proportion of energy intake from macronutrients, total sugar and proportion of energy from different “taste clusters”

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Food choices and intake behaviours are guided by our preferences, and these preferences are thought to inform our habitual dietary behaviour [1]. The relationship between taste preferences and our dietary intake and body composition have been studied over many years, yet few studies to date have successfully confirmed a relationship between taste preference and dietary habits. Psycho-hedonic taste profiles can differ widely by age and vary across different taste qualities but have been shown to be stable at an individual level over time, providing insights on how liking may influence wider food choice and intake behaviour [3,4,5]. Variations in taste preferences between individuals may inform differences in habitual energy intake and dietary behaviours and, over time, differences in body composition

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call