Associations between Kratom risk perceptions and intention to legalize in Malaysia

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background or Objective This paper delves into the dichotomy of Kratom in Malaysia, designated as an illegal substance under the Poison Act 1952. Amidst heightened concerns regarding Kratom usage, debates revolve around balancing perceived benefits and potential adverse effects, particularly in pain management. Employing the perceived risk theory, the study aims to scrutinize the intention to legalize Kratom. Methods Data from 335 respondents form the basis of the study. The perceived risk theory serves as the framework for understanding the complexities of Kratom legalization to legalize in Malaysia. The study employs a structured questionnaire to assess social, financial, physical, psychological, and performance risks. Results The findings indicate significant impacts of social, financial, physical, and psychological risks on behavioral intentions toward Kratom legalization. However, performance risk does not exhibit a significant impact on the intention to legalize Kratom. Conclusions This study contributes crucial insights for policymakers, highlighting the intricate dynamics of Kratom legalization. Addressing various risk factors is deemed essential for the formulation of effective regulatory policies. The results emphasize the need for nuanced considerations in understanding and managing the legalization of Kratom in the Malaysian context.