Abstract
BackgroundCharacterizing multipollutant health effects is challenging. We use classification and regression trees to identify multipollutant joint effects associated with pediatric asthma exacerbations and compare these results with those from a multipollutant regression model with continuous joint effects.MethodsWe investigate the joint effects of ozone, NO2 and PM2.5 on emergency department visits for pediatric asthma in Atlanta (1999–2009), Dallas (2006–2009) and St. Louis (2001–2007). Daily concentrations of each pollutant were categorized into four levels, resulting in 64 different combinations or “Day-Types” that can occur. Days when all pollutants were in the lowest level were withheld as the reference group. Separate regression trees were grown for each city, with partitioning based on Day-Type in a model with control for confounding. Day-Types that appeared together in the same terminal node in all three trees were considered to be mixtures of potential interest and were included as indicator variables in a three-city Poisson generalized linear model with confounding control and rate ratios calculated relative to the reference group. For comparison, we estimated analogous joint effects from a multipollutant Poisson model that included terms for each pollutant, with concentrations modeled continuously.Results and discussionNo single mixture emerged as the most harmful. Instead, the rate ratios for the mixtures suggest that all three pollutants drive the health association, and that the rate plateaus in the mixtures with the highest concentrations. In contrast, the results from the comparison model are dominated by an association with ozone and suggest that the rate increases with concentration.ConclusionThe use of classification and regression trees to identify joint effects may lead to different conclusions than multipollutant models with continuous joint effects and may serve as a complementary approach for understanding health effects of multipollutant mixtures.
Highlights
Humans breathe a mixture of different air pollutants
A common epidemiological approach for addressing mixtures has been through single pollutant models, in which a single pollutant effect is viewed as a surrogate for a particular air pollution mixture
In a recent paper we showed how classification and regression trees (C&RT) can be adapted for epidemiologic research, to control for confounding, and become a useful tool for generating hypotheses about multipollutant joint effects [12]
Summary
Humans breathe a mixture of different air pollutants Characterization of these multipollutant mixtures in relation to health effects has been addressed by air pollution research groups for decades. A common epidemiological approach for addressing mixtures has been through single pollutant models, in which a single pollutant effect is viewed as a surrogate for a particular air pollution mixture. Two reviews of statistical approaches for multipollutant research were recently published [8, 9] In both reviews, classification and regression trees (C&RT), a supervised recursive partitioning approach, was cited as a method for handling multipollutant exposures; there have been few applications of C&RT in assessing the health effects of ambient air pollution exposure [10, 11]. We use classification and regression trees to identify multipollutant joint effects associated with pediatric asthma exacerbations and compare these results with those from a multipollutant regression model with continuous joint effects
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
