Abstract

There is conflicting literature on the relationship between prolonged QRS duration (QRSd) and arrhythmic events, including sudden cardiac death (SCD), in heart failure patients with or without implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of prolonged QRSd relative to arrhythmic outcomes in medically and ICD-treated patients enrolled in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial (MADIT) II. Using a Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for ejection fraction, heart failure class, and blood urea nitrogen, we estimated the association of prolonged QRSd >/=140 ms with SCD in the medically treated arm and SCD or first appropriate ICD therapy for rapid ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF; cycle length </=260 ms) in the ICD-treated arm. In the medically treated arm, prolonged QRSd was a significant independent predictor of SCD (hazard ratio 2.12; 95% confidence interval 1.20-3.76; P = .01). However, in the ICD-treated arm, prolonged QRSd did not predict SCD or rapid VT/VF (hazard ratio 0.77; 95% CI 0.47-1.24; P = .28). The difference in the prognostic effect of prolonged QRSd in these two groups was significant (P<.01). These results were not affected by varying the cycle length that defines rapid VT/VF or the duration that defines QRSd prolongation. In patients with prior myocardial infarction and EF </=30%, prolonged QRSd does not predict SCD/VT/VF in ICD-treated patients but does predict SCD in medically treated patients. This underscores the nonequivalence of VT/VF and SCD and the need for caution in inferring risk of SCD when using nonrandomized databases that include only patients with ICDs.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call