Association of ATM mutations in metastatic prostate cancer with differential genomic alteration profiles from homologous recombination deficient and proficient tumors.

Abstract

5063 Background: ATM mutations, one of a family of DNA repair defects prevalent in prostate cancer, have been included in a list of actionable mutations for PARP inhibitor (PARPi) therapeutic trials. Despite preclinical evidence, PARPi have shown minimal clinical activity in ATM mutant prostate cancer (ATMmPCa). The present analysis explores co-occurring genomic alterations that may drive outcomes of metastatic PCa (mPCa) patients with tumors harboring ATM mutations and provide clues for understanding therapy resistance and potential targets. Methods: This study included molecular profiling analysis of 1375 cases of mPCa. Tumors were analyzed using next-generation sequencing (NGS), whole transcriptome sequencing (WTS), and immunohistochemistry (IHC) (Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ). dMMR/MSI-H status was determined by IHC, NGS, and fragment analysis and tumor mutational burden (TMB) was calculated based on somatic nonsynonymous missense mutations. We performed differential gene expression analysis of HR-associated transcripts such as ATR, PARP1-3, RAD50, RAD51A/B/C/D and RAD54. Significance was determined using the ꭓ2 test and Benjamini-Hochberg method. Results: Fifty-nine (4.2%) cases harbored pathogenic ATM mutations, 84 (6.2%) harbored BRCA2 mutations. 1018 tumors (74%) were deemed homologous recombination proficient (HRP) and 155 tumors (11.3%) were HR Deficient (HRD); harboring one or more mutation in HR-related genes excluding ATM and BRCA2. The mutation rate of TP53 was significantly lower in ATMmPCa (12.0%) compared to BRCA2mPCa (35%), HRD (35%) and HRP (46.6%) tumors. ATMmPCa showed higher rates of SMAD2 (3.7%/1%) and FLCN (5.2%/0.3%) alterations compared to HRP cases. PARP1 and RAD51D gene expression was reduced in ATMmPCa compared to HRP (p < 0.05) and BRCA2mPCa ( p < 0.05) tumors, respectively. No differences in gene expression levels were detected for ATR, PARP2, PARP3, RAD50, and RAD54. Chromosomal segments demonstrating differential CNA in ATMmPCa vs HRP, HRD, or BRCA2mPCa included FGF19, FGF4, PTPN11, ALDH2, DAXX, BCL7A, CCND1, BMPR1A and MEF2B (Q-value < 0.05 determined by ꭓ2). The most common CNA in ATMmPCa was CCND1, present in approximately 13% (7/55) of cases. Compared to BRCA2mPCa and HRD cases, ATMmPCa cases are less likely to display markers of immunotherapy response such as dMMR/MSI-H or TMB ≥10 mutations/MB. Conclusions: ATMmPCa demonstrated several differences in co-occurring alterations compared to BRCA2mPCa, HRD and HRP mPCa. ATMmPCa tumors were less likely to harbor alterations in TP53 compared to BRCA2, HRD or HRP tumors. CNA in ATMmPCa occurred in 9 genes across distinct mPCa molecular subtypes and were enriched for those associated with the 11q13 amplicon harboring Cyclin D1. The FGF and PTPN11 related pathways are potentially targetable pathways in ATMmPC and may merit further study.