Abstract
Aim: The aim of this study was to compare characteristics of erupted and impacted third molars in the mandible and themaxilla using quantitative measurements and determine any relationship between the eruption/impaction pattern ofthird molars in both jaws with available eruption space and tooth inclination.Material and Methods: Patients who visited to the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at tertiary care instituteof India were screened for eligibility to join our study. The eruption status of the third molars in both jaws were examinedon orthopantomographs by measuring the distance from the line tangent to the highest points of occlusal cusps of thethird molar to that of the adjacent second molar. The presence of available space for the eruption was determined by theratio of the mesiodistal length of the third molar crown to the length of the alveolar arch distal to second molars.Results: There was sufficient space for the eruption of third molars in 17.6% of the cases in the mandible as opposedto 61.7% of the cases in the maxilla. In the mandible, 37.7% of third molars were in vertical position, 37.1% were inmesioangular position, and 19.9% were in distoangular position. In the maxilla, 62.5% of third molars were in verticalposition and 33.12% were in distal inclination. The presence of favorable parameters does not warrant full eruption ofthird molars in both jaws.Conclusion: Removal of impacted third molars is the most commonly employed procedure in oral surgery practice. Painand pericoronitis were the most common symptoms usually associated with level A impaction and vertical position.
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call