Abstract

When modelling the dispersion of pollutants in the atmosphere, uncertainty in the simulation results that depend on the available data used as input conditions is a critical issue, particularly in the context of emergency response to the accidental release of harmful substances. In the framework of the UDINEE Project, a Lagrangian particle dispersion model is used to simulate puff emissions in four different test cases, using input wind velocity data from two different datasets, both representative of the flow at the time of the release. The effect of the choice of the input data on the final concentration distribution at ground level is discussed and compared with observations. A statistical analysis is applied to estimate the deviation between the results of the two runs. The bias between the two concentration fields, connected to the variability and the uncertainty in the input flow, is found to be of similar magnitude to the typical bias between model predictions and observations.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call