Assessment of the Risk of Damage to 110 kV Overhead Lines Due to Wind

Andrew Lukas Chojnacki

doi:10.3390/en14030556

Abstract

The article presents an assessment of the risk of damage to 110 kV overhead power lines as a result of the impact of wind of variable speeds on that equipment. A statistical method for the assessment of the reliability of power structures in conditions of variable strength of the structure and at variable exposure values is presented. This method is based on the analysis of the shape and mutual location of the distributions of the probability density of the momentary resistance (strength) of the tested structure and the exposures of variable values occurring in its surroundings. The risk of wind damage to 110 kV lines has been determined on the basis of many years of observations of wind speed and failure rate of the lines. Wind has been shown to be the fault factor or co-factor responsible for damage in one in five failures of such equipment. The final part of the article includes an analysis of the obtained results and their interpretation.

Highlights

IntroductionAssessment of the Risk of Damage to
In order to be able to use the presented model in practice, it is necessary to determine the theoretical function of the probability density function of the wind speeds that occur, which in this case are the exposure, and the theoretical density probability function of the wind speed at the moment of failure of 110 kV overhead lines, expressing the momentary limit resistance in the analysed model
In order to be able to use the presented model in practice, it is necessary to determine the theoretical function of the probability density function of the wind speeds that 9occur, of 14 which in this case are the exposure, and the theoretical density probability function of the wind speed at the moment of failure of 110 kV overhead lines, expressing the momentary limit resistance in the analysed model

Summary

Introduction

Assessment of the Risk of Damage to. 110 kV Overhead Lines Due to Wind. Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations

Methods

Results

Conclusion