Abstract

Background: It is important to find an accurate and cost-effective tool for the early diagnosis of breast cancer which is the most common cancer in women worldwide. Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography(CEDM) is an emerging modality in depicting abnormalities seen at screening mammography and it could demonstrate disease extension and help in detecting response to therapy. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of CEDM in the diagnosis and differentiation between benign and malignant breast masses and mass-like lesions. Patients & methods: This prospective study included 100 female patients with 154 breast lumps, their ages ranged from 30-75 years (Mean= 42±5.3) who referred with a suspicious breast lump. Informed consent was obtained from all patients. All patients were subjected to local breast examination of both breast sides, renal function tests; Conventional mammography (CM), breast ultrasonography (U/S), and contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM). Diagnoses confirmed by biopsy and histopathology results that used as a gold standard. Results: The 154 studied lesions found to be: 122 malignant neoplastic lesions (79.22%) and 32 benign lesions (20.78%) according to the histopathology results.CEDM was found to have higher sensitivity (97.56%), specificity (93.55%), and accuracy (96.75%) when compared to combined CM and U/S results that showed sensitivity (62.30%), specificity (68.75%), and accuracy (63.64%), Conclusion: Contrast-enhanced digital mammography found to be a low-cost effective diagnostic method in the differentiation between benign and malignant breast mass lesions that can improve diagnostic accuracy and increase the cancer detection rate.

Highlights

  • Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women worldwide, and it is important to find an accurate and cost-effective tool for its early diagnosis 1

  • contrast enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) has a higher sensitivity for breast cancer detection compared with the sensitivities of full-field digital mammography (FFDM) alone and FFDM combined with ultrasound

  • This study was carried on 100 patients with 154 breast lesions that according to the histopathology results proved to be:-122 malignant neoplastic lesions (79.22%), with 98invasive lesions & 24 lesions were non-invasive

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women worldwide, and it is important to find an accurate and cost-effective tool for its early diagnosis 1. CEDM has a higher sensitivity for breast cancer detection compared with the sensitivities of full-field digital mammography (FFDM) alone and FFDM combined with ultrasound. Aim of the study: to evaluate the accuracy of CEDM in the diagnosis and differentiation between benign and malignant breast masses and mass like lesions. Results: The 154 studied lesions found to be: 122 malignant neoplastic lesions (79.22%) and 32 benign lesions (20.78%) according to the histopathology results.CEDM was found to have higher sensitivity (97.56%), specificity (93.55%) and accuracy (96.75%) when compared to combined CM and U/S results that showed sensitivity (62.30%), specificity (68.75%) and accuracy (63.64%) Conclusion: Contrast-enhanced digital mammography found to be a low cost effective diagnostic method in the differentiation between benign and malignant breast mass lesions that can improve diagnostic accuracy and increase cancer detection rate

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call