Abstract

Abstract The study assessed the contributions of stakeholders to livestock development through provision of infrastructure to rural areas of Delta State, Nigeria. The objectives were to describe the socio-economic characteristics of respondents, appraise the role of external stakeholders in livestock development, verify any existing relationship between livestock development and rural development indicators and identify the challenges faced by respondents. A purposive and simple random sampling techniques were used to select the three major towns and 180 respondents. Data were collected by questionnaire and subjected to descriptive and inferential statistics. Result obtained showed that majority of the respondents were males (68.3%) with higher national diplomat (HND)/First degree (33.3%) and have a mean age of 42 years. The first four highest external stakeholders were skills training and entrepreneurship programme (94%), youth agricultural entrepreneurs programme (90.6%), job creation agency (89.4%) and FADAMA (80.0%) that promoted livestock development. A significant relationship was observed based on infrastructural contributions to livestock development (p < 0.05) among the variables: market, water project, market and roads. Serious challenges included high cost of feed facilities (mean = 3.69) and insufficient power supply (mean = 3.49). The study concluded that the more available the rural infrastructure intervention, the more developed the livestock sector. The study recommended that stakeholders should make their extension agent available to livestock farmers.

Highlights

  • It is affirmed that sustainable rural development approaches in relation to agriculture, agro-industrial, agro-allied value chains, and business, if satisfactorily adopted and adapted in Nigeria, could transform the rural communities to desirable elevations in human and socio-economic development (Ndukwe and Omeji 2015)

  • The adoption of sustainable development goal (SDG) II was one of the community development tools that encouraged rural infrastructural development in African countries, and 70% of the focus target group lives in rural areas and sub-urban areas and is reliant on agriculture for a living (International Livestock Research Institute 2004)

  • The specific objectives of the study were to: (i) describe the socio-economic characteristics of the livestock farmers, (ii) appraise the role of external stakeholders in livestock development sector, (iii) verify any existing relationship between various sectors of livestock development and rural development indicators, and (iv) identify the challenges faced by livestock development practitioners

Read more

Summary

Introduction

It is affirmed that sustainable rural development approaches in relation to agriculture, agro-industrial, agro-allied value chains, and business, if satisfactorily adopted and adapted in Nigeria, could transform the rural communities to desirable elevations in human and socio-economic development (Ndukwe and Omeji 2015). The livestock sector has passed through relative growth in recent years principally powered by worldwide increase in demand for food of animal products. This has been attributed mostly to population growth, urbanization and returns on investment which is liken to livestock revolution (Delgado et al 1999). The positive relationship between agriculture and development, principally in subSaharan Africa, is seen as a yardstick to achieving sustainable development. The adoption of sustainable development goal (SDG) II was one of the community development tools that encouraged rural infrastructural development in African countries, and 70% of the focus target group lives in rural areas and sub-urban areas and is reliant on agriculture for a living (International Livestock Research Institute 2004). Using world development indicator data from Nigeria for selected periods, we find a strong positive connection among food production, primary school enrolment ratio and gender impartiality, while there is a strong negative relationship between food production and child mortality rates

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call