Assessment of Ruminal Bacterial Populations and Protozoal Generation Time in Cows Fed Different Methionine Sources

Abstract

Methionine supplemented as 2-hydroxy-4-(methylthio)-butanoic acid (HMB) has been suggested to alter bacterial or protozoal populations in the rumen. Our objective was to determine if source of Met would change microbial populations in the rumen and to compare those results to samples from the omasum. The ruminal and omasal samples were collected from cows fed control (no Met), dl-Met, HMB, or the isopropyl ester of HMB (HMBi; estimated 50% rumen protection) in a replicated 4×4 Latin square design. In one square, changes in protozoal populations were determined using microscopic counts and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE), whereas changes in bacterial populations were determined using DGGE and ribosomal intergenic spacer length polymorphism (RIS-LP). Neither the protozoal counts nor the DGGE banding patterns derived from protozoa were different among the dietary treatments or for ruminal vs. omasal samples. As revealed by both DGGE and RIS-LP, bacterial populations clustered by treatments in ruminal and especially in omasal samples. Using cows from both Latin squares, the flow of protozoal cells from the rumen was quantified by multiplying protozoal cell count in omasal fluid by the omasal fluid flow (using CoEDTA as a liquid flow marker) or was estimated by rumen pool size of cells multiplied by either the ruminal dilution rate of CoEDTA (after termination of CoEDTA dosing) or the passage rate of Yb-marked particles. Compared with the omasal fluid flow measurement (16.4h), protozoal generation time was approximated much more closely using the particulate than the fluid passage rate from the rumen (generation times of 15.7 and 7.5h, respectively). There seems to be minimal selective retention of protozoal genera in the rumen in dairy cattle fed every 2h. Data support the validity of the omasal sampling technique under our conditions.