Abstract

BackgroundAdequate monitoring of older adults’ physical activity (PA) is essential to develop effective health promotion programs. The present study examined criterion validity and test-retest reliability of the long International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-L), adapted for Belgian, community-dwelling older adults (65y and older).MethodsParticipants (n = 434) completed the last seven days version of IPAQ-L, modified for the Belgian population of community-dwelling older adults. This elderly-adapted version of IPAQ-L combined vigorous and moderate activities, and questions on gait speed and recreational cycling were added. Furthermore, participants wore an ActiGraph GT3X(+) accelerometer for at least five days. Criterion validity was determined by comparing self-reported weekly minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and weekly minutes of total PA with accelerometer data, defined by two different cut points (Freedson vs. Copeland). To examine test-retest reliability, a subsample of 29 participants completed IPAQ-L for a second time within a ten day interval.ResultsIPAQ-L showed moderate criterion validity for measuring weekly minutes of MVPA and total PA (Spearman’s ρ range 0.33–0.40). However, plots on agreement between self-reported and accelerometer PA showed a systematic over-reporting of IPAQ-L for MVPA. In contrast, plots indicated that IPAQ-L under-estimated levels of total PA, however, this under-estimation of total PA was substantially lower than the observed over-reporting of MVPA. Test-retest reliability was moderate-to-good for work-related PA, domestic PA, MVPA and total PA (ICC range 0.52–0.81), but poorer for transportation and recreational PA (ICC 0.44 and 0.43, respectively).ConclusionsCriterion validity results suggest that IPAQ-L is more valid to measure older adults’ weekly minutes of total PA than weekly MVPA minutes. Moreover, results might imply that content validity of IPAQ-L can be improved if specific light-intensity PA items are incorporated into IPAQ-L. Test-retest reliability of IPAQ-L was moderate to good, except for weekly minutes of transportation and recreational PA, probably due to week-to-week variability of these behaviors.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-015-1785-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • Adequate monitoring of older adults’ physical activity (PA) is essential to develop effective health promotion programs

  • According to the 2011 Compendium of Physical Activities [27], items on light-intensity PA (LPA) could ask for home activities such as “dusting or polishing furniture” (~2.3 Metabolic Equivalents (METs)); “washing dishes, clearing dishes from the table” (~2.5 METs), or “cleaning, sweeping, light effort” (2.3 METs), as these activities are likely to be reported as moderate-intensity instead of light-intensity

  • In summary, validity results of the present study indicated that our adapted version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)-L should be considered with caution when estimates of older adults’ weekly minutes of moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) are made, because participants tended to over-report their MVPA

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Adequate monitoring of older adults’ physical activity (PA) is essential to develop effective health promotion programs. The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ; www.ipaq.ki.se), available in a short (IPAQ-S) and a long (IPAQ-L) format, serves as the most commonly used tool to collect self-reported PA and was designed to make cross-national comparisons possible. Both formats can give an indication of total PA, but their main focus lies on measuring moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA). IPAQ-L assesses more detailed information on the PA context and is used to evaluate population PA levels Such contextspecific indices are needed to develop effective and context-specific intervention programs, as different correlates may exist for separate PA domains [7]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call