Abstract

From network RTK to PPP-RTK, it is highly expected that high-precision positioning within a few minutes can be achieved with a sparse reference network. In this study, we investigate a rapid multi-frequency PPP convergence strategy based on Galileo E1/E5a/E6 and BeiDou-3 B1C/B2a/B3I signals, whose unambiguous wide-lane observables can efficiently assist in speeding up narrow-lane ambiguity resolution. Furthermore, frequency-specific biases existing on the third-frequency observables have been observed to slow down multi-frequency PPP-AR convergence. In this study, we partially mitigated their effects by estimating a second satellite clock for the third frequency of signals. We validated this approach with one month of data collected from 22 stations. On average, it took about 18 min for PPP wide-lane ambiguity resolution (PPP-WAR) to converge, while 32 min were required for ambiguity-float PPP. Compared with dual-frequency PPP-AR, which needed nearly 12 min to converge, multi-frequency PPP-AR required 6 min only. Once there were more than 10 satellites involved in PPP, the convergence could be achieved within 3 min on average. Meanwhile, 81% and 62% of multi-frequency PPP-AR solutions converged successfully within 5 and 1 min, respectively. Finally, we carried out a vehicle-borne experiment to validate this approach in a kinematic environment. Owing to frequent cycle slips during the movement of vehicle, it took 14 min for B1C/B2a/B3I and E1/E5a/E6 PPP-AR to obtain reliable positions, and 19 min for those using the other signal combinations B1C/B2a/B2b and E1/E5a/E5b, owning to higher noise. Overall, these results are promising for achieving high-precision PPP positioning globally within a few minutes if multi-frequency biases can be handled well in the data processing.

Highlights

  • Published: 23 November 2021Precise point positioning (PPP) can achieve centimeter-level absolute positioning without any nearby reference stations [1,2]

  • The convergence performance of Published: November 2021Precise point positioning (PPP)-AR is analyzed with respect to different satellite numbers

  • We have found that the disagreement of multi-frequency receiver-pair phase center offsets (PCO) can reach to 1–3 mm between those provided by EPN

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Precise point positioning (PPP) can achieve centimeter-level absolute positioning without any nearby reference stations [1,2]. PPP has long been plagued by its slow convergences, spanning a few tens of minutes, to ambiguity-fixed solutions, which hinders its application in some time-critical scenarios such as autonomous driving [3,4]. [5] demonstrated that real-time kinematic (RTK) positioning could converge to the comparable precision of PPP within a few seconds on a short baseline (≤10 km). The requirement of a dense reference network makes it difficult to apply RTK to wide areas. [8] stated that such a dense local reference network was always required to calculate precise corrections for rapid centimeter-level positioning Ref. [8] stated that such a dense local reference network was always required to calculate precise corrections for rapid centimeter-level positioning

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call