Assessment of Midwives’ Knowledge and Application of the Modified WHO Partograph at Ga South Public Health Facilities, Greater Accra, Ghana

Abstract

Background The partograph, one of the vital tools available for the midwife, was originally developed from Friedman’s 1954 Cervicograph by Philpott and Castle in 1972. It was later modified and adopted by the WHO as a universal ‘gold standard’ tool for recording and monitoring progress in labour and providing interventions in cases of abnormal labour. The goal of this study was to assess the level of knowledge of midwives and their utilisation of the modified WHO partograph at the Ga South Municipality in the Greater Accra Region of Ghana. Methodology An institution-based quantitative cross-sectional study was conducted within the municipality from February to March 2019. One hundred and ten (110) midwives were recruited using the census approach. Data were collected using a structured self-administered questionnaire. STATA statistical software version 14 was used for descriptive analysis and results were reported in the form of percentages and frequencies using charts and tables. Pearson’s Chi-Square estimation was also performed to test the association between selected variables with a p value <.05 as the threshold for statistical significance. Results Of the 110 participants, 105 (95.5%) of the midwives could properly describe the partograph and 104 (94.5%) understood that it was used as a tool for vital decision-making, while 92 (83.6%) indicated that partograph contributes in reducing maternal and new-born deaths. Almost all participants, 109 (99.09%) knew all the parameters of the partograph and were also aware that plotting the partograph begins at a cervical dilation of 4 cm. Also, while a good number of participants 103 (93.64%) knew that cervical dilation on the partograph is carried out every four hours during the active phase of labour, 110 (100%) indicated that progress of labour is assessed by the degree of cervical dilation and descent of the presenting part. Routine usage of the partograph was recorded among the majority of midwives, 102 (92.7%), to record and monitor the progress of labour in expectant women. Bivariate analysis showed a significant association between the use of the modified WHO partograph and the knowledge of midwives on Ghana Health Service (GHS) policies ( p = .045). There was, however, no positive association determined among age ( p = .66), rank ( p = .77), years of professional experience ( p = 1.00), place of work ( p = .51), work shift and highest qualification ( p = 1.00) as far as knowledge and use of the WHO modified partograph are concerned. Conclusion The findings of the study underscore the desirable level of knowledge and usage of the partograph among study participants. This affirms that the knowledge and usage of the partograph within the facilities in Ga South health facilities hold the prospect of enhancing the safety of expectant mothers.