Assessment of Mechanical Root Canal Preparation with Centric Reciprocating or Eccentric Rotary Kinematics: A Micro–computed Tomographic Study

Abstract

IntroductionThe aim of this study was to compare, using micro–computed tomographic imaging, the preparation of mesial canals of mandibular molars with the Reciproc (VDW GmbH, Munich, Germany) and XP-endo Shaper (FKG, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland) systems, evaluating changes in dentin and canal volume, the percentage of untouched walls, the volume of accumulated hard tissue debris, and root canal deviation in the apical third. MethodsTwenty-four mandibular molars with 2 mesial root canals and a single foramen were anatomically paired and divided into 2 experimental groups (n = 12) according to the system used. The specimens were scanned before and after preparation with the SkyScan 1176 microtomographic scanner (Bruker-microCT, Kontich, Belgium) at a resolution of 17.42 μm. The resulting data were statistically compared at a significance level of 5% using the Student t test and the Mann-Whitney test. ResultsA significant difference was observed in the untouched surface area for the total canal and the cervical and middle thirds, with the lowest untouched surface area in the XP-endo Shaper group (P < .05). The volume of accumulated hard tissue debris was significantly higher in the Reciproc group in the total canal as well as in the middle and apical thirds. There was no significant difference between the groups regarding the volume of dentin removed or the increase in canal volume and surface area (P > .05). ConclusionsThe XP-endo Shaper touched more walls and left less accumulated hard tissue debris in the root canal system than the Reciproc group. Although the XP-endo Shaper showed superior results, neither system was able to fully prepare the root canal.