Abstract

PurposeTo systematically analyze intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) MRI in a perfusable capillary phantom closely matching the geometry of capillary beds in vivo and to compare the validity of the biexponential pseudo‐diffusion and the recently introduced phase‐distribution IVIM model.MethodsIVIM‐MRI was performed at 12 different flow rates (0.2⋯2.4mL/min) in a capillary phantom using 4 different DW‐MRI sequences (2 with monopolar and 2 with flow‐compensated diffusion‐gradient schemes, with up to 16 b values between 0 and 800s/mm2). Resulting parameters from the assessed IVIM models were compared to results from optical microscopy.ResultsThe acquired data were best described by a static and a flowing compartment modeled by the phase‐distribution approach. The estimated signal fraction f of the flowing compartment stayed approximately constant over the applied flow rates, with an average of f=0.451±0.023 in excellent agreement with optical microscopy (f=0.454±0.002). The estimated average particle flow speeds v=0.25⋯2.7mm/s showed a highly significant linear correlation to the applied flow. The estimated capillary segment length of approximately 189um agreed well with optical microscopy measurements. Using the biexponential model, the signal fraction f was substantially underestimated and displayed a strong dependence on the applied flow rate.ConclusionThe constructed phantom facilitated the detailed investigation of IVIM‐MRI methods. The results demonstrate that the phase‐distribution method is capable of accurately characterizing fluid flow inside a capillary network. Parameters estimated using the biexponential model, specifically the perfusion fraction f, showed a substantial bias because the model assumptions were not met by the underlying flow pattern.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call