Abstract

Fish consumption is the main exposure pathway of the neurotoxicant methylmercury (MeHg) in humans. The risk associated with exposure to MeHg may be modified by its interactions with selenium (Se) and arsenic (As). In vitro bioaccessibility studies have demonstrated that cooking the fish muscle decreases MeHg solubility markedly and, as a consequence, its potential absorption by the consumer. However, this phenomenon has yet to be validated by in vivo models. Our study aimed to test whether MeHg bioaccessibility can be used as a surrogate to assess the effect of cooking on MeHg in vivo availability. We fed pigs raw and cooked tuna meals and collected blood samples from catheters in the portal vein and carotid artery at: 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300, 360, 420, 480 and 540 min post-meal. In contrast to in vitro models, pig oral bioavailability of MeHg was not affected by cooking, although the MeHg kinetics of absorption was faster for the cooked meal than for the raw meal. We conclude that bioaccessibility should not be readily used as a direct surrogate for in vivo studies and that, in contrast with the in vitro results, the cooking of fish muscle did not decrease the exposure of the consumer to MeHg.

Highlights

  • Fish provides a means of food security and offers an elevated nutritional value [1]

  • Methylmercury is the main Hg species found in fish muscle, representing over 80% of total Hg [6]

  • The main As species known to interact with Se are the inorganic forms [12], this later representing a low proportion in fish muscle compared with that of organic species [13,14,15,16]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The consumption of fish is the primary pathway of human exposure to mercury (Hg) and its organic form, methylmercury (MeHg) [2]. Methylmercury is the main Hg species found in fish muscle, representing over 80% of total Hg [6]. Se can be found in inorganic or organic forms, such as selenate, selenomethionine, and selenoneine [7,10,11]. The main As species known to interact with Se are the inorganic forms [12], this later representing a low proportion in fish muscle compared with that of organic species (iAs ranges from

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call