Abstract

The enthalpies of formation for some selected oxygenates have been calculated by the atomisation energy approach using B3LYP, BHandHLYP, MPW3LYP, MPW1K, MPWB1K, BB1K, MPW1B95, BMK, and long-range corrected (LC-ωPBE, LC-BOP, LCgau-BOP, LC-BOP12, LCgau-B97) density functionals, as well as the composite CBS-QB3 method. Compared with experiment, BMK, LC-ωPBE, LCgau-BOP, LC-BOP12, LCgau-B97, MPW195, MPW3LYP functionals and CBS-QB3 give root mean square errors (RMSE) in enthalpies of formation no greater than 4 kcal/mol, whilst MPW1K and BHandHLYP show much worse performance (RMSE of 20–40 kcal/mol). The B3LYP, MPWB1K, and BB1K results fall between the two extremes. Energy barriers for the dominant paths in the unimolecular decomposition of simple esters (HCO2CH3, C2H5CO2C2H5), C1–C3 acids, and 1-butanol are reproduced well by CBS-QB3, BMK, BB1K, LCgau-B97, and PW1B95 (RMSE = 1–2 kcal/mol), while other LC methods (LC-ωPBE, LC-BOP, LCgau-BOP, and LC-BOP12) show a deviation of up to 4 kcal/mol. For the ionisation potentials, calculated from Koopman's theorem, all of the investigated LC-methods give good results compared with other density functional theory functionals with a maximum deviation of 0.4 eV, except for LCgau-B97, which has an RMSE of 0.7 eV.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.