Abstract
Fluid therapy is a critical, and often primary treatment modality in the management of various critical conditions. Like any therapeutic intervention, intravenous fluids require precise indications, contraindications, and dosing, all determined through the assessment of a patient’s volume status. Hemodynamic assessment plays a pivotal role in the treatment of critically ill patients, enabling clinicians to administer appropriate fluid therapy and cardiovascular support to optimize tissue perfusion and oxygenation. Traditional methods of assessing fluid responsiveness, which are predominantly static such as central venous pressure and pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, often fall short in their predictive accuracy under dynamic clinical conditions. Consequently, there is a growing interest in dynamic methods of fluid responsiveness assessment, which analyze cardiovascular response to specific preload changes. This literature review aims to explore various dynamic methods of hemodynamic assessment, discussing their advantages and limitations based on sources from databases like PubMed and MEDLINE.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
