Abstract

This study is an effort to propose a conceptual model to measure the impact assessment of entrepreneurship pedagogic. It delineates entrepreneurship education pedagogic into four dimensions and opined specific level for each dimension. Reviewing the entrepreneurship education programme, assessment of entrepreneurship pedagogic evaluates the structure that influence growth mindset development through embedded heuristic strategies, thus, the impact on entrepreneurship knowledge and entrepreneurial capital asset context is proposed. Affirming Fayolle, Gailly, and Lassa-Clerc conceptual affinity that entrepreneurship education share with learning theories and entrepreneurship pedagogical content knowledge were conceptualized to suggest some practical realism guidelines of what insightful philosophy of teaching entrepreneurship need to achieve. With direct synthesis of relevant literature, propositions relating to entrepreneurship pedagogic structure along with the institutional connectedness and associated dimensions of entrepreneurship pedagogic assessment outcome were postulated. Also, the paper proposes the need for further assessment of specific forms of pedagogic impact on entrepreneurial human capital asset.

Highlights

  • The concept of assessment of entrepreneurial pedagogy can be defined as an active model of instruction that is premised through active participation of students to initiate and comprehend creativity, encourage bield thinking skills, and resourceful use of networks to activate transformative learning (Fayolle, Gailly, & Lassas-Clerc, 2006)

  • The concept of pedagogic framework to assess content specificity, entrepreneurial knowledge and decisional capital are quite lacking in measuring the impact on students’ growth mindset development as the foundation to capture the needed entrepreneurial knowledge and entrepreneurship human capital asset. In view of these gaps, this study proposes a conceptual model to assess the entrepreneurship education pedagogy impact along with the institutional connectedness of teacher support and career ambitions in the acquisition of entrepreneurship knowledge and entrepreneurial human capital assets outcome

  • This paper addresses the need for impact assessment of entrepreneurship education pedagogic

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The concept of assessment of entrepreneurial pedagogy can be defined as an active model of instruction that is premised through active participation of students to initiate and comprehend creativity, encourage bield thinking skills, and resourceful use of networks to activate transformative learning (Fayolle, Gailly, & Lassas-Clerc, 2006). Scholarly exposition of Acs and Szerb (2010) attest that teaching entrepreneurship as a resource capital assets should consider its impact on students’ mindset as well as the transitive process from factor-driven and efficiency-driven stages into the holistic innovative-driven stage This encourages the mindset of entrepreneurial knowledge and effectual outcome on human capital assets and economy. The concept of pedagogic framework to assess content specificity, entrepreneurial knowledge and decisional capital are quite lacking in measuring the impact on students’ growth mindset development as the foundation to capture the needed entrepreneurial knowledge and entrepreneurship human capital asset In view of these gaps, this study proposes a conceptual model to assess the entrepreneurship education pedagogy impact along with the institutional connectedness of teacher support and career ambitions in the acquisition of entrepreneurship knowledge and entrepreneurial human capital assets outcome. Presented ahead before relevant conclusion is drawn, are the theoretical contributions and practical implications

Exposition of assessment practice
Description of entrepreneurship education pedagogics assessments
Entrepreneurship education pedagogic
Curriculum context knowledge
Curriculum content knowledge
Student growth mindset
Entrepreneurship knowledge and entrepreneurial human capital assets
Contribution and implications
Conclusions
Recommendation for future research
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call