Abstract
The availability of traditional siliceous Class F fly ash, produced when burning bituminous coals, is decreasing around the world as many countries begin to switch to renewable energy sources. Existing coal burning power plants are also starting to convert from bituminous to subbituminous coals, which produce calcareous Class C fly ash, or to a blend of the two to reduce emissions and cost. To prolong the availability of siliceous fly ash, suppliers have started distributing blended coal ashes and have also begun to blend siliceous fly ash with other coal combustion products (CCPs), such as calcareous fly ash or bottom ash, or natural pozzolans. A variety of these blended fly ashes were examined in this study and compared to a traditional siliceous fly ash. Although these fly ashes have similar oxide compositions and physical characteristics to a traditional siliceous fly ash, the crystalline and glassy phases present in the fly ash may differ. This can alter cement hydration and result in failure to mitigate expansion due to sulfate attack. In all other performance and durability tests conducted in this study, all fly ashes performed well in cement-based mixtures.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have