Abstract
This paper attempts to explore whether Stafford Beer's Viable System Model (VSM) explains the viability of start-ups. The assumption that the five structural components of the VSM (Systems 1-5) positively influence the viability of start-ups has been tested empirically. Neither each individual hypothesis for every system could be confirmed nor could the total structure of the VSM be falsified. However, the results indicate that strategic management (System 4) has the most positive and significant influence on the viability of start-ups. The present study makes the VSM accessible for quantitative empirical research and contributes substantially to overcome criticism concerning the abstractness of the model.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
