Abstract

Abstract. Improved skill of long-range weather forecasts has motivated an increasing effort towards developing seasonal hydrological forecasting systems across Europe. Among other purposes, such forecasting systems are expected to support better water management decisions. In this paper we evaluate the potential use of a real-time optimization system (RTOS) informed by seasonal forecasts in a water supply system in the UK. For this purpose, we simulate the performances of the RTOS fed by ECMWF seasonal forecasting systems (SEAS5) over the past 10 years, and we compare them to a benchmark operation that mimics the common practices for reservoir operation in the UK. We also attempt to link the improvement of system performances, i.e. the forecast value, to the forecast skill (measured by the mean error and the continuous ranked probability skill score) as well as to the bias correction of the meteorological forcing, the decision maker priorities, the hydrological conditions and the forecast ensemble size. We find that in particular the decision maker priorities and the hydrological conditions exert a strong influence on the forecast skill–value relationship. For the (realistic) scenario where the decision maker prioritizes the water resource availability over energy cost reductions, we identify clear operational benefits from using seasonal forecasts, provided that forecast uncertainty is explicitly considered by optimizing against an ensemble of 25 equiprobable forecasts. These operational benefits are also observed when the ensemble size is reduced up to a certain limit. However, when comparing the use of ECMWF-SEAS5 products to ensemble streamflow prediction (ESP), which is more easily derived from historical weather data, we find that ESP remains a hard-to-beat reference, not only in terms of skill but also in terms of value.

Highlights

  • In a water-stressed world, where water demand and climate variability (IPCC, 2013) are increasing, it is essential to improve the efficiency of existing water infrastructure along with, or possibly in place of, developing new assets (Gleick, 2003)

  • The average forecast skill on 1 January is obtained by averaging the continuous ranked probability skill score (CRPSS) values of the hydrological forecasts for the periods 1 January–1 April (3 months’ lead time), 1 February–1 April (2 months) and 1 March– 1 April (1 month)

  • As for the forecast value, we find that the perfect forecast brings value in the two scenarios that prioritize the increase in resource availability, dynamical streamflow prediction (DSP) brings no value in any scenarios, DSP-corr has a positive value in the rap and bal scenario and ensemble streamflow prediction (ESP) in the bal only

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In a water-stressed world, where water demand and climate variability (IPCC, 2013) are increasing, it is essential to improve the efficiency of existing water infrastructure along with, or possibly in place of, developing new assets (Gleick, 2003). The usefulness of hydrological forecasts has been demonstrated in several applications, to enhance reservoir operations for flood management (Voisin et al, 2011; Wang et al, 2012; Ficchì et al, 2016) and hydropower production (Faber and Stedinger, 2001; Maurer and Lettenmaier, 2004; Alemu et al, 2010; Fan et al, 2016). Forecast products with such lead times, i.e. “seasonal” forecasts, are typically less skilful compared to the short-range forecasts used for flood control or hydropower production applications

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call