Abstract

ABSTRACT This research compares the role performance of solutions journalism in reporting the COVID-19 pandemic in 25 countries and regions. While solutions journalism performed more interventionist, facilitator, and civic-oriented roles overall, it highlighted different responses and responders in the coverage and exemplified different roles in various regions. Solutions journalism enacted more interventionist and facilitator roles when reporting the government-led containment of the virus in East Asia and non-U.S. Western countries where COVID-19 cases were lower. Solutions journalism performed a civic-oriented role to report the grassroots’ efforts to combat the pandemic in the United States, where COVID-19 infection was more severe. However, solutions journalism failed to implement service role and watchdog role in a time of crisis when the public needs more how-to advice and accountability.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.