Assessing the Potential of Extra-Early Maturing Landraces for Improving Tolerance to Drought, Heat, and Both Combined Stresses in Maize

BackgroundAbiotic stresses due to environmental factors could adversely affect the growth and development of crops. Among the abiotic stresses, drought and heat stress are two critical threats to crop growth and sustainable agriculture worldwide. Considering global climate change, incidence of combined drought and heat stress is likely to increase. The aim of this study was to shed light on plant growth performance and leaf physiology of three tomatoes cultivars (‘Arvento’, ‘LA1994’ and ‘LA2093’) under control, drought, heat and combined stress.ResultsShoot fresh and dry weight, leaf area and relative water content of all cultivars significantly decreased under drought and combined stress as compared to control. The net photosynthesis and starch content were significantly lower under drought and combined stress than control in the three cultivars. Stomata and pore length of the three cultivars significantly decreased under drought and combined stress as compared to control. The tomato ‘Arvento’ was more affected by heat stress than ‘LA1994’ and ‘LA2093’ due to significant decreases in shoot dry weight, chlorophyll a and carotenoid content, starch content and NPQ (non-photochemical quenching) only in ‘Arvento’ under heat treatment. By comparison, the two heat-tolerant tomatoes were more affected by drought stress compared to ‘Arvento’ as shown by small stomatal and pore area, decreased sucrose content, ΦPSII (quantum yield of photosystem II), ETR (electron transport rate) and qL (fraction of open PSII centers) in ‘LA1994’ and ‘LA2093’. The three cultivars showed similar response when subjected to the combination of drought and heat stress as shown by most physiological parameters, even though only ‘LA1994’ and ‘LA2093’ showed decreased Fv/Fm (maximum potential quantum efficiency of photosystem II), ΦPSII, ETR and qL under combined stress.ConclusionsThe cultivars differing in heat sensitivity did not show difference in the combined stress sensitivity, indicating that selection for tomatoes with combined stress tolerance might not be correlated with the single stress tolerance. In this study, drought stress had a predominant effect on tomato over heat stress, which explained why simultaneous application of heat and drought revealed similar physiological responses to the drought stress. These results will uncover the difference and linkage between the physiological response of tomatoes to drought, heat and combined stress and be important for the selection and breeding of tolerant tomato cultivars under single and combine stress.

Heat and drought stresses have negative impacts on wheat yield and growth worldwide, causing up to 60% and 40% yield losses, respectively, but their combined effect can cause severe losses. The present study aimed to identify the high-yielding genetic resources tolerant to drought and/or heat stresses under climate change scenarios. The field trials on 42 genotypes were conducted at three locations in four environments (normal TSIR-NS, drought TSRF-DR, heat LSIR-HT, and heat and drought combined LSRF-DHT) each for two consecutive years. Yield contributing traits were recorded in all the experiments and all the locations: SI (susceptibility index) and STI (stress tolerance index) were also estimated. GY (Grain yield) was severely affected by LSRF-DHT (48.6%), followed by TSRF-DR (23.6%) and LSIR-HT (16.8%). GY had a positive correlation with BM (biomass), HI (harvest index), and TGW (1000-grain weight) under all environments and negative with DH (days to heading) (LSIR-HT and LSRF-DHT). Stepwise regression analysis revealed a higher contribution of BM and HI towards GY under all environments. GW (grain weight/spike) contributed under LSIR-HT and LSRF-DHT, and GN (grain number/spike) under TSIR-NS and TSRF-DR. GFD (grain-filling duration), TGW, and PTL (productive tillers) contributed under all conditions except LSRF-DHT. WS 2016-4 was the only genotype that yielded high under all the conditions. WS 2016-12 and CNM 16-1 were tolerant to heat and drought stresses and high yielding. HINDI 62, HTW 11, and QBP 1606 were less sensitive to all the stresses but low yielding. Overall, out of 30 tolerant genotypes (10 of each category), 19 adapted to escape mechanism which is irrespective of their yielding level. The study demonstrated the potential of identified genotypes in wheat breeding for climate resilience and the traits imparting tolerance to these genotypes.

Photosynthetic, antioxidant activities, and osmoregulatory responses in winter wheat differ during the stress and recovery periods under heat, drought, and combined stress

The individual and cumulative effects of drought stress (DS) and heat stress (HS) are the primary cause of grain yield (GY) reduction in a rainfed agricultural system. Crop failures due to DS and HS are predicted to increase in the coming years due to increasingly severe weather events. Plant available silicon (Si, H4SiO4) has been widely reported for its beneficial effects on plant development, productivity, and attenuating physiological and biochemical impairments caused by various abiotic stresses. The current study investigated the impact of pre-sowing Si treatment on six contrasting wheat cultivars (four drought and heat stress-tolerant and two drought and heat stress-susceptible) under individual and combined effects of drought and heat stress at an early grain-filling stage. DS, HS, and drought-heat combined stress (DHS) significantly (p < 0.05) altered morpho-physiological and biochemical attributes in susceptible and tolerant wheat cultivars. However, results showed that Si treatment significantly improved various stress-affected morpho-physiological and biochemical traits, including GY (>40%) and yield components. Si treatment significantly (p < 0.001) increased the reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging antioxidant activities at the cellular level, which is linked with higher abiotic stress tolerance in wheat. With Si treatment, osmolytes concentration increased significantly by >50% in tolerant and susceptible wheat cultivars. Similarly, computational water stress indices (canopy temperature, crop water stress index, and canopy temperature depression) also improved with Si treatment under DS, HS, and DHS in susceptible and tolerant wheat cultivars. The study concludes that Si treatment has the potential to mitigate the detrimental effects of individual and combined stress of DS, HS, and DHS at an early grain-filling stage in susceptible and tolerant wheat cultivars in a controlled environment. These findings also provide a foundation for future research to investigate Si-induced tolerance mechanisms in susceptible and tolerant wheat cultivars at the molecular level.

Heat stress along with low water availability at reproductive stage (terminal growth phase of wheat crop) is major contributing factor towards less wheat production in tropics and sub-tropics. Flag leaf plays a pivotal role in assimilate partitioning and stress tolerance of wheat during terminal growth phase. However, limited is known about biochemical response of flag leaf to combined and individual heat and drought stress during terminal growth phase. Therefore, current study investigated combined and individual effect of terminal drought and heat stress on water relations, photosynthetic pigments, osmolytes accumulation and antioxidants defense mechanism in flag leaf of bread wheat. Experimental treatments comprised of control, terminal drought stress alone (50% field capacity during reproductive phase), terminal heat stress alone (wheat grown inside plastic tunnel during reproductive phase) and terminal drought stress + terminal heat stress. Individual and combined imposition of drought and heat stresses significantly (p≤0.05) altered water relations, osmolyte contents, soluble proteins and sugars along with activated antioxidant defensive system in terms of superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD) and ascorbate peroxidase (APX). Turgor potential, POD and APX activities were lowest under individual heat stress; however, these were improved when drought stress was combined with heat stress. It is concluded that combined effect of drought and heat stress was more detrimental than individual stresses. The interactive effect of both stresses was hypo-additive in nature, but for some traits (like turgor potential and APX) effect of one stress neutralized the other. To best of our knowledge, this is the first report on physiological and biochemical response of flag leaf of wheat to combine heat and drought stress. These results will help future studies dealing with improved stress tolerance in wheat. However, detailed studies are needed to fully understand the genetic mechanisms behind these physiological and biochemical changes in flag leaf in response to combined heat and drought stress.

Heat and drought priming induce tolerance to subsequent heat and drought stress by regulating leaf photosynthesis, root morphology, and antioxidant defense in maize seedlings

The present study was carried out to investigate the effect of individual drought, heat, and combined drought and heat stress on tomato plants. Combined stress resulted in the higher accumulation of Proline (101.9%), MDA (38.55%), H2O2 (101.19%), and lower levels of RWC (53.84%). Individual drought and heat stress decreased photosynthetic pigments like total chlorophyll content by (45.45%) and (25.35%), respectively, higher rates of pigment reduction (79.42%) were observed under combined drought and heat stress. Combined stress decreased PSII efficiency (Fv/Fm), quantum yield (ΦPSII), and photochemical efficiency (qp) and increased non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) levels. Moreover, the gas exchange parameters E, A, and Pn decreased by 5.36%, 36.45%, and 51.00%, respectively, in comparison to control plants. Antioxidant enzymes, SOD, APX, CAT, and GR showed a two- to threefold increase under combined drought and heat stress; however, the non-enzymatic antioxidants AsA and GSH displayed one-twofold increase under combined stress. Moreover, 2- to 2.5-fold decrease was observed in MDHAR and DHAR enzyme transcripts under combined stress conditions. The transcripts corresponding to AsA-GSH pathway enzymes SOD, APX, GR, DHAR, and MDHAR were up-regulated by 8- to 12-fold under combined drought and heat. Furthermore, DREB and LEA transcripts were up-regulated under drought and combined stress and down-regulated under drought stress. In the same manner, HSP70 and HSP90 transcripts were up-regulated under heat and combined stress; however, the transcription levels got down-regulated under drought stress. Additionally, rbcL and RCA transcripts were down-regulated especially under combined stress in comparison to individual drought and heat conditions. PSIP680 relative expression levels were up-regulated under drought stress; however, the transcripts were down-regulated under heat and combined stress. Taken together, the results suggest that the combined stress has a predominant effect over individual stress.

Cool‐season turfgrasses are frequently subjected to heat and drought stresses during summer months. This study was conducted to determine physiological responses of Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.) to drought and heat alone or together, and the effects of drought preconditioning on plant responses to subsequent heat stress. Kentucky bluegrass (cv. Mystic) was subjected to drought and/or heat stress (35°C/30°C, day/night) in growth chambers for 40 d. Canopy photosynthetic rate (Pn) and leaf photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm) decreased under drought and heat stress. The decline in Pn was more severe under heat than under drought stress during the first 12 d of treatment. The reduction in Fv/Fm ratio was more severe under drought stress than under heat stress after 20 d of treatment. The combined heat and drought stresses (H+D) caused more dramatic reductions in Pn and Fv/Fm than either heat or drought alone, starting at 3 and 9 d after treatment, respectively. Drought or heat alone, or H+D, significantly reduced root dry weight. However, reduction was more severe under heat alone than under drought stress, particularly in the top 20 cm of soil. Drought preconditioning enhanced plant tolerance to subsequent heat stress but had no influence on plant tolerance to H+D. Drought‐preconditioned plants maintained higher water status, stomatal conductance, and transpiration rate, and had significantly higher Pn and root dry weight than non‐preconditioned plants during subsequent heat stress. No significant difference in Fv/Fm was observed between drought‐preconditioned and non‐preconditioned plants under either heat alone or H+D. The results indicated that simultaneous drought and heat stresses were more detrimental than either stress alone. Drought preconditioning could improve Kentucky bluegrass tolerance to subsequent heat stress.

The effects of heat and drought stress on the ecophysiological responses and growth of Afrocarpus falcatus and Podocarpus henkelii seedlings

Adaptability to abiotic stress regulated by γ-aminobutyric acid in relation to alterations of endogenous polyamines and organic metabolites in creeping bentgrass

Drought, heat, and combined drought and heat are important abiotic stresses constraining the production and productivity of maize ( Zea mays L.) in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). In the face of climate change, these stresses are likely to occur simultaneously and put at risk food and economic security in SSA. This review describes maize breeding activities conducted by the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) in partnership with national scientists under the Drought Tolerant Maize for Africa (DTMA) and Stress Tolerant Maize for Africa (STMA) projects, which together sought to develop and deploy multiple stress tolerant hybrids, and open-pollinated varieties. Emphasis was on (i) developing a reliable methodology for screening maize for tolerance to drought stress (DS), heat stress (HS), and combined drought and heat stress (CDHS) using key secondary traits and grain yield, (ii) use of appropriate breeding techniques for tailoring maize for tolerance to DS, HS and CDHS, (iii) exploring diverse sources of germplasm for genetic enhancement of maize, (iv) extensive multilocational evaluation to identify genotypes with stable performance under the stresses, and (v) application of genomic tools to accelerate genetic gains in maize breeding at IITA. At IITA, the performance of maize hybrids under stresses of DS, HS and CDHS have been improved using conventional breeding techniques/procedures. These techniques/ procedures have led to accelerated genetic gains in yield that were 26–49% higher than the best commercial hybrid checks under CDHS and DS. Additive gene action has been consistently found to be more important than the non-additive among early maize under DS and CDHS while both the additive and non-additive have been reported to be important for the extra-early maize. The most reliable secondary traits for selecting for improved grain yield under the stresses include anthesis-silking interval, ears per plant, and plant and ear aspects. Several early and extra-early landraces have been identified as potential sources of tolerance to DS, HS, and CDHS. Several quantitative trait loci (QTLs) associated with grain yield and key secondary traits have been identified via genome-wide association studies in landraces and inbred lines. Those desirable QTLs, upon validation, could be invaluable for genomics-enabled breeding.

Despite the importance of maize as a staple crop in Southern Africa, production remains subdued, averaging 1 tha−1 under smallholder farming systems. Although the low yields can be attributed to several biotic (e.g., pests and diseases) and abiotic (e.g., infertile soils) phenomenon, the climate change-induced abiotic stresses (in particular, heat and drought) are regarded as the major constrains threatening maize productivity, globally. Since climatic models are predicting exacerbated incidences of drought and heat stress, societies that depend on maize for survival will also be at risk if plant breeders lose focus in developing varieties productive under these predicted climatic scenarios. In this review, we provide: (1) a summary of the known effects of drought and heat stress on maize production, (2) a summation of the morpho-physiological adaptation mechanisms of maize to heat and drought as well as (3) a summary of strides made on the molecular front in understanding how heat and drought stress tolerance/resistance in maize is genetically controlled. We hypothesize that a better understanding of how heat and drought stress impacts of maize productivity, together with a deeper appreciation of mechanisms employed by maize germplasm tolerant/resistant to the stress conditions, can guide maize breeders in structuring a holistic program for developing maize varieties productive under these abiotic stresses.

Plants of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Vinjett) were exposed to moderate water deficit at the vegetative growth stages six-leaf and/or stem elongation to investigate drought priming effects on tolerance to drought and heat stress events occurring during the grain filling stage. Compared with the non-primed plants, drought priming could alleviate photo-inhibition in flag leaves caused by drought and heat stress episodes during grain filling. In the primed plants, drought stress inhibited photosynthesis mainly through decrease of maximum photosynthetic electron transport rate, while decrease of the carboxylation efficiency limited photosynthesis under heat stress. The higher saturated net photosynthetic rate of flag leaves coincided with the lowered non-photochemical quenching rates in the twice-primed plants under drought stress and in the primed plants during stem elongation under heat stress. Compared to the non-priming treatment, drought priming either applied once or twice alleviated the grain yield reduction by drought stress during grain filling, and priming during the stem elongation stage alleviated yield loss by heat stress at grain filling. The higher concentration of abscisic acid in primed plants under drought stress could contribute to higher grain yield compared to the non-primed plants. Taken together, the results indicate that drought priming during vegetative stages improved tolerance to both drought and heat stress events occurring during grain filling in wheat.

Exploring the synergistic effects of drought and heat stress on chickpea seed development: Insights into nutritional quality and seed yield

Drought and heat stresses are the major abiotic stress factors detrimental to maize ( Zea mays L.) production. Much attention has been directed toward plant responses to heat or drought stress. However, maize reproductive stage responses to combined heat and drought remain less explored. Therefore, this study aimed to quantify the impact of optimum daytime (30°C, control) and warmer daytime temperatures (35°C, heat stress) on pollen germination, morpho‐physiology, and yield potential using two maize genotypes (“Mo17” and “B73”) under contrasting soil moisture content, that is, 100% and 40% irrigation during flowering. Pollen germination of both genotypes decreased under combined stresses (42%), followed by heat stress (30%) and drought stress (19%). Stomatal conductance and transpiration were comparable between control and heat stress but significantly decreased under combined stresses (83% and 72%) and drought stress (52% and 47%) compared with the control. Genotype “Mo17” reduced its green leaf area to minimize the water loss, which appears to be one of the adaptive strategies of “Mo17” under stress conditions. The leaf reflectance of both genotypes varied across treatments. Vegetation indices associated with pigments (chlorophyll index of green, chlorophyll index of red edge, and carotenoid index) and plant health (normalized difference red‐edge index) were found to be highly sensitive to drought and combined stressors than heat stress. Combined drought and heat stresses caused a significant reduction in yield and yield components in both Mo17 (49%) and B73 (86%) genotypes. The harvest index of genotype “B73” was extremely low, indicating poor partitioning efficiency. At least when it comes to “B73,” the cause of yield reduction appears to be the result of reduced sink number rather than the pollen and source size. To the best of our awareness, this is the first study that showed how the leaf‐level spectra, yield, and quality parameters respond to the short duration of independent and combined stresses during flowering in inbred maize. Further studies are required to validate the responses of potential traits involving diverse maize genotypes under field conditions. This study suggests the need to develop maize with improved tolerance to combined stresses to sustain production under increasing temperatures and low rainfall conditions.