Abstract

Phenology is a reliable indicator of vegetation condition and ecological changes in the environment. Plant Spectral Phenology (PSP) offers the potential for the development of automated, rapid, and wide-area vegetation monitoring systems. The spectral characteristics of plants (vegetation) are employed as metrics of PSP, which can be sensed both proximally and remotely. A key objective is to undertake a comparative analysis of the results of PSP versus those of phenology based on visual observations. The resolution of this issue is of paramount importance for the coordination of phenological studies at diverse levels (ground, surface, and remote), thus ensuring the continuity of phenological studies conducted prior to the advent of PSP. This issue is particularly pronounced in the case of evergreen conifers. The present study focuses on four evergreen conifers: Thuja occidentalis, Platycladus orientalis, Pinus sylvestris and P. nigra subsp. pallasiana. Hyperspectral imaging was performed under laboratory conditions using a Cubert UHD-185 hyperspectral camera. Concomitantly, phenological observations were conducted. The spectral time series yielded 79 chlorophyll-sensitive and carotenoid-sensitive Vegetation Indices (VIs), which were then used to construct double logistic functions. A significant proportion of the VIs exhibited a high degree of correctness with regard to the aforementioned functions, as indicated by the value of R2 exceeding 0.7. The values of the principal stages of seasonal development of evergreen conifers, namely the Start of Season (SOS), End of Season (EOS), Position of Peak value (POP) and Length of Season (LOS), were calculated using double logistic functions. These stages were matched to the phenological phases of development of the experimental plants. The values of SOS, EOS, POP and LOS varied significantly depending on the VIs used as a metric as well as the evergreen conifers. The lowest variability by metrics is observed in SOS, while the maximum is observed in EOS and POP. The results obtained may be of importance for the choice of criterion for the comparison of PSP with phenology based on visual observations and the most suitable VIs for these purposes.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.