Assessing the Implementation Mechanism of International Educational Aid

Abstract

This research evaluated the implementation framework of international educational assistance for foreign students in China, concentrating on access and fairness, infrastructure and resources, policy and governance, sustainability, and monitoring and evaluation. The mixed-methods research encompassed 200 international students from several universities around China. Quantitative data were obtained by structured surveys and analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, and qualitative data were acquired through casual interviews. Findings indicated that respondents favorably assessed access and equity, observing diminished educational obstacles. Nevertheless, apprehensions were expressed regarding inequitable budget allocation and inadequate research infrastructure. Policy and governance were perceived as transparent although inconsistent in resource distribution, whereas sustainability garnered moderate evaluations, with students voicing apprehensions over post-graduation assistance. Monitoring and evaluation were assessed as mediocre, indicating a necessity for more regular program assessments. Notable evaluation disparities arose based on the students' characteristics, especially concerning infrastructure and governance. Identified challenges encompassed bureaucratic delays, insufficient transparency, inequitable resource allocation, cultural impediments, and inadequate non-academic assistance. Notwithstanding these problems, the scholarship program favorably influenced students' academic prospects, research competencies, and social connections. Nonetheless, apprehensions over the enduring viability of the assistance were widespread.