Abstract
This study focuses on evaluating the influence of criterion weights on the ranking of the top ten universities in Vietnam. Criteria weights were determined using four different methods, including the equal weight method, the weights of the Vietnam University Rankings (VNUR) system, the entropy weight method, and the Logarithmic Percentage Change-driven Objective Weighting (LOPCOW) weight method. Four university ranking methods were applied: Proximity Indexed Value (PIV), Ranking of Alternatives with Weights of Criterion (RAWEC), Root Assessment Method (RAM), and Simple Ranking Process (SRP). The results indicate that the use of different weight calculation methods does not significantly affect university rankings. The four leading universities in Vietnam consistently maintain their position in the rankings, regardless of the weight calculation or ranking methods used.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
