Abstract

Forest utilization makes a significant economic contribution to the livelihoods of rural households, especially those living in developing countries. This study was conducted to determine the absolute and relative forest income and measure the distributional impact of forest income on economic inequalities among rural households in the Rubi-Tele Hunting Domain (RTHD), Democratic Republic of the Congo (DR Congo). Household socioeconomic data and other qualitative informations were collected using structured household-level surveys, focus group discussions, and key informant interviews. The study used descriptive statistical analysis, Gini coefficient, and Lorenz curve computation. Additionally, the non-parametric alternative Kruskal–Wallis Test was also used. Findings revealed that 89.76% of the households’ sample were involved in forest-based activities. The annual average income from these forest-based activities was estimated at CDF 1,219,951.58 (USD 659.08) per household, contributing 32.46% to total annual household income. Other income sources share constituted 37.09%, 10.04%, 8.30%, 7.63%, 2.41%, and 2.08% from crop, livestock keeping, business activities, fishing, and non-forest environmental activities, paid employment, and other income sources, respectively. There was a significant difference between annual household income in terms of income sources (p < 0.5). Forest income constituted the second most crucial income portfolio after crop income. Bushmeat income share was higher than other forest products income share. However, the proportion of households involved in firewood extraction was substantial (80.70%). Gini coefficient and Lorenz curve analysis proved that forest income helped reduce economic inequality among the sampled households by 11%. Therefore, reducing access to forest would significantly impact rural households’ welfare and could increase income disparities. The present study provides valuable information for developing sustainable forest management policies and strategies to maintain and enhance the economic benefit of forest use without damaging biodiversity conservation.

Highlights

  • Research has been focused on understanding and quantifying the economic contribution that forest resources make to the millions of rural households who live near forests [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]

  • The findings of this study highlighted the crucial economic contribution of forest use to the livelihoods of the rural household living in the Rubi-Tele Hunting Domain (RTHD)/DR Congo

  • The main objective of this study was to assess the economic contribution of forest use to rural livelihoods of households living in the Rubi-Tele Hunting Domain/DR Congo

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Natural forests are an essential component of Earth’s ecosystems and an integral part of rural livelihoods, especially in underdeveloped economies. In rural areas of less developed countries, indigenous communities still lack modern amenities and livelihood opportunities. Forest use is a significant contributor to household cash income and sustenance [1]. Theoretical arguments and empirical findings frequently appear in the academic literature supporting the forest-led poverty alleviation school of thought and those advocating the fundamental role of forests in poverty reduction [2]. Research has been focused on understanding and quantifying the economic contribution that forest resources make to the millions of rural households who live near forests [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.