Assessing quality of life after surgery

Abstract

Researchers and clinicians increasingly are recognizing the importance of assessing a wide range of outcomes when evaluating the efficacy of medical therapies or procedures. We developed and evaluated a set of self-report scales that assessed both generic and condition-specific aspects of health-related quality of life before and after surgery. We report data from a study of patients having one of four types of surgery at six teaching hospitals in California and Massachusetts. The four surgical conditions studied were: total hip replacement, transurethral prostatectomy, cholecystectomy, and coronary artery bypass graft surgery. All the outcome scales, except for those assessing cognitive functioning and fatigue, had internal consistencies greater than 0.70. The pattern of correlations between the scales and other measures of health status are similar to those reported in other studies and provide evidence of their construct validity. The scales also appeared to be sensitive to differences between presurgical and postsurgical health-related quality of life. The results suggest that the scales used were easy to administer, reliable, valid, and offered important information about outcomes of surgery that is not provided by more traditional clinical indicators.