Assessing Public Attitudes to Electroconvulsive Therapy

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an established treatment for major depressive disorder, yet it remains controversial. Attitudes toward ECT have been studied in members of the public and service users, with diverse findings. There is no systematically validated scale to quantify attitudes. The aim of this study was to validate a scale measuring attitudes toward ECT using a systematic analysis. Validation consisted of 3 stages: item generation, theoretical analysis, and psychometric analysis. A total of 196 members of the public were surveyed, and the findings were used to perform principal component analysis, Cronbach alpha (CA), and interitem correlation. The Modified ECT Attitudes Questionnaire (EAQ) is a 22-item participant-rated questionnaire (0-44) consisting of 2 principal components: "moral and ethical perceptions of ECT" and "ECT as a last resort treatment." There was adequate reliability for the total EAQ (CA, 0.873) and each of the components (component 1 CA, 0.907; component 2 interitem correlation, 0.389). Among the 196 members of the public, the mean score was 20.4 (SD, 8.4), which equates to 46% positive responses. Component 1 elicited 39% positive responses; component 2 elicited 52% positive responses. The emotion components of attitudes elicited particularly negative responses. The EAQ is a validated and reliable scale for the measurement of attitudes toward ECT. Application of this scale to 196 members of the public indicates that negative attitudes are rooted in individuals' moral and ethical objections to ECT, particularly the emotion components of such attitudes. This scale can be applied to other groups, including service users, to further characterize attitudes that underlie the stigma toward ECT.