Aspheric versus wavefront-guided aspheric photorefractive keratectomy in eyes with significant astigmatism

Abstract

To compare the refractive and higher-order aberrations (HOAs) outcomes after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in patients with significant astigmatism using aspheric versus wavefront-guided aspheric profiles. Ophthalmic Research Center and Department of Ophthalmology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Negah Eye Hospital, Tehran, Iran. Prospective randomized case series. One eye of each patient with a refractive astigmatism more than 2.00 diopters (D) randomly received aspheric PRK. In theother eye, wavefront-guided and aspheric treatment was performed using a personalized treatment advanced algorithm. Visual acuity, refractive errors, and HOAs were compared between the 2 groups preoperatively and 12months postoperatively. The study comprised 32 patients (64 eyes). The mean preoperative refractive astigmatism was -4.07 D ± 1.64 (SD) and -4.02±1.55 D in the aspheric group and wavefront-guided aspheric group, respectively (P=.2). The mean postoperative astigmatism was -0.46±0.37 D and -0.82±0.53 D in theaspheric group and wavefront-guided aspheric group, respectively (P=.02). Postoperatively, the root mean square of total HOAs was significantly increased in both groups. However, compared with wavefront-guided aspheric PRK, aspheric PRK induced fewer HOAs (P=.003). In eyes with high astigmatism, post-PRK residual astigmatism was lower in the aspheric group than in the wavefront-guided aspheric group. The increase in HOAs was significantly higher in the wavefront-guided aspheric group than in the aspheric group.