Abstract

BackgroundWe review our outcomes and experience of artificial urinary sphincter implantation for patients with refractory urinary incontinence from different causes.MethodsBetween April 2002 and May 2017, a total of 32 patients (median age, 40.8 years) with urinary incontinence had undergone artificial urinary sphincter placement during urinary tract reconstruction. Eighteen patients (56.3%) were urethral injuries associated urinary incontinence, 9 (28.1%) had neurogenic urinary incontinence and 5 (15.6%) were post-prostatectomy incontinence. Necessary surgeries were conducted before artificial urinary sphincter placement as staged procedures, including urethral strictures incision, sphincterotomy, and augmentation cystoplasty.ResultsThe mean follow-up time was 39 months. At the latest visit, 25 patients (78.1%) maintained the original artificial urinary sphincter. Four patients (12.5%) had artificial urinary sphincter revisions. Explantations were performed in three patients. Twenty-four patients were socially continent, leading to the overall success rate as 75%. The complication rate was 28.1%; including infections (n = 4), erosions (n = 4), and mechanical failure (n = 1). The impact of urinary incontinence on the quality of life measured by the visual analogue scale dropped from 7.0 ± 1.2 to 2.2 ± 1.5 (P <0.001).ConclusionsThe primary sources for artificial urinary sphincter implantation in our center are unique, and the procedure is an effective treatment as a part of urinary tract reconstruction in complicated urinary incontinence cases with complex etiology.

Highlights

  • We review our outcomes and experience of artificial urinary sphincter implantation for patients with refractory urinary incontinence from different causes

  • Artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation is a wellestablished treatment for refractory stress urinary incontinence (SUI) resulting from intrinsic sphincter deficiency (ISD) [1]

  • AUS placement is primarily performed in men with post-radical prostatectomy (RP) incontinence [4]; there is scant published data for other etiologies [1,2,3, 5]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

We review our outcomes and experience of artificial urinary sphincter implantation for patients with refractory urinary incontinence from different causes. Artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation is a wellestablished treatment for refractory stress urinary incontinence (SUI) resulting from intrinsic sphincter deficiency (ISD) [1]. It is versatile and effective in a wide range of situations, including post-prostatectomy incontinence (PPI) or other urethral surgery-related incontinence, traumatic urethral disruption as a result of a prior pelvic fracture, radical pelvic surgery, neurogenic causes, and as a salvage procedure after other treatments have failed [2, 3].

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call