Abstract

Artificial light at night (ALAN) demonstrated a new ecological factor that influences organisms through a multi-approach. Yet, the impacts of ALAN on understory plants remain largely unknown. We evaluated whether ALAN would affect the leaf mass per area (LMA) of understory plants through a two-year field light experiment in a tropical rubber plantation in south China. We hypothesized that ALAN could impact the understory in two ways: by directly supplementing light to aboveground plant parts (which increases LMA) and indirectly affecting soil nutrient composition by attracting insects (which decreases LMA). We selected two species: Colocasia gigantea, representing shade-tolerant species, and Melastoma candidum, representing light-demanding species. We measured canopy openness, LMA, soil nutrients, and individual distance away from light resources. Our Bayesian linear mixed model showed a negative relationship between LMA and the strength of ALAN, indicating that ALAN may influence LMA more indirectly by enhancing soil nutrient availability rather than directly acting as a light resource. This relationship was significant for Colocasia gigantea but not for Melastoma candidum. These results suggest that ALAN might have complex and species-specific impacts on the understory ecosystem. Our study underscores the need for continued research and informed management of anthropogenic ecosystems.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call