Abstract

Prospects of the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the administration of justice actualize a set of legal issues that are not only applied but also theoretical in nature, including the issue of the formation of the legal concept of “artificial intelligence” for the purposes of legal regulation. The legal academic literature describes a tendency to attribute signs of subjectivity to artificial intelligence, in connection with which the paper attempts to carry out a critical analysis of foundations of such approach. The authors explain inadmissibility of inclusion of such a characteristic as a legal capacity in the concept of “artificial intelligence.” They also argue that in jurisprudence it is useless to apply definitions of artificial intelligence based on the description of technical-technological characteristics because it has no influence on the legal regulation. The incorporation of artificial intelligence as a sociocultural phenomenon into legal reality requires either an independent term for its designation in the field of law or the filling of this concept with a specific legal content. The development of such content should be carried out within the framework of the paradigm of the legal science, since the use of categories and definitions of other branches and spheres of public life without being adopted to the legal field, is unlikely to be effective for the regulatory purposes.

Highlights

  • На наш взгляд основания к атрибутированию признака субъектности при конструировании юридического понятия искусственного интеллекта (ИИ) отсутствуют

  • Prospects of the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the administration of justice actualize a set of legal issues that are applied and theoretical in nature, including the issue of the formation of the legal concept of “artificial intelligence” for the purposes of legal regulation

  • The legal academic literature describes a tendency to attribute signs of subjectivity to artificial intelligence, in connection with which the paper attempts to carry out a critical analysis of foundations of such approach

Read more

Summary

Introduction

На наш взгляд основания к атрибутированию признака субъектности при конструировании юридического понятия ИИ отсутствуют. Перспективы использования технологии искусственного интеллекта при отправлении правосудия актуализируют комплекс юридических вопросов не только прикладного, но и теоретического характера, в числе которых вопрос формирования юридического понятия «искусственный интеллект» для целей правового регулирования.

Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.