Artificial-intelligence-driven volumetric breast density estimation with digital breast tomosynthesis in a racially diverse screening cohort.

Abstract

e13538 Background: Breast density is considered a well-established breast cancer risk factor. As quasi-3D, digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) becomes increasingly utilized for screening, there is an opportunity to routinely estimate volumetric breast density (VBD). However, current methods extrapolate VBD from 2D images acquired with DBT and/or depend on the existence of raw DBT data, which is rarely archived due to cost and storage constraints. Using a racially diverse screening cohort, this study evaluates the potential of deep learning for VBD assessment based solely on 3D reconstructed, “for presentation” DBT images. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 1,080 negative DBT screening exams obtained between 2011 and 2016 from the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (racial makeup, 41.2% White, 54.2% Black, 4.6% Other; mean age ± SD, 57 ± 11 years; mean BMI ± SD, 28.7 ± 7.1 kg/m2), for which both 2D raw and 3D reconstructed DBT images (Selenia Dimensions, Hologic Inc) were available. Corresponding 3D reference-standard tissue segmentations were generated from previously validated software that uses both 3D reconstructed slices and raw 2D DBT data to provide VBD metrics, shown to be strongly correlated with VBD measures from MRI image volumes. We based our deep learning algorithm on the U-Net architecture within the open-source Generally Nuanced Deep Learning Framework (GaNDLF) and created a 3-label image segmentation task (background, dense tissue, and fatty tissue). Our dataset was randomly split into training (70%), validation (15%) and test (15%) sets. We report on the performance of our deep learning algorithm against corresponding reference-standard segmentations for a cranio-caudal (CC) view-only subset. We also stratify our results by the two main racial groups (White and Black). Our evaluation measure was the weighted Dice score (DSC), with 0 signifying no overlap and 1 signifying perfect overlap, overall and separately for each label. Results: Our deep learning algorithm achieved an overall DSC of 0.682 (STD = 0.136). It accurately segmented the three labels of background, fatty tissue, and dense tissue, with DSC scores of 0.995, 0.884, and 0.617, respectively. DSC for White and Black women were 0.688 (STD = 0.127) and 0.680 (STD = 0.146), respectively. Conclusions: Our preliminary analysis suggests that deep learning shows promise in the estimation of VBD using 3D DBT reconstructed, “for presentation” CC view images and does not demonstrate bias among racial groups. Future work involving optimization of performance in other breast views as well as transfer learning based on ground truth masks by clinical radiologists could further enhance this method. In view of rapid clinical conversion to DBT screening, such a tool has the potential to enable large retrospective epidemiological and personalized risk assessment studies of breast density with DBT.