Abstract
The objective of this study was to compare the estimates of pump flow and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) derived from a mathematical regression model to those from an artificial deep neural network (ADNN). Hemodynamic and pump-related data were generated using both the Cleveland Clinic continuous-flow total artificial heart (CFTAH) and pediatric CFTAH on a mock circulatory loop. An ADNN was trained with generated data, and a mathematical regression model was also generated using the same data. Finally, the absolute error for the actual measured data and each set of estimated data were compared. A strong correlation was observed between the measured flow and the estimated flow using either method (mathematical, R = 0.97, p < 0.01; ADNN, R = 0.99, p < 0.01). The absolute error was smaller in the ADNN estimation (mathematical, 0.3 L/min; ADNN 0.12 L/min; p < 0.01). Furthermore, strong correlation was observed between measured and estimated SVR (mathematical, R = 0.97, p < 0.01; ADNN, R = 0.99, p < 0.01). The absolute error for ADNN estimation was also smaller than that of the mathematical estimation (mathematical, 463 dynes·sec·cm -5 ; ADNN, 123 dynes·sec·cm -5 , p < 0.01). Therefore, in this study, ADNN estimation was more accurate than mathematical regression estimation. http://links.lww.com/ASAIO/A991.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call