Arthropod Encounter Rate: A Null Model Based on Random Motion

Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessArthropod Encounter Rate: A Null Model Based on Random MotionJoseph De Vita, Donald Kelly, and Stanley PayneJoseph De Vita Search for more articles by this author , Donald Kelly Search for more articles by this author , and Stanley Payne Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The American Naturalist Volume 119, Number 4Apr., 1982 Published for The American Society of Naturalists Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/283928 Views: 4Total views on this site Citations: 11Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1982 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Rachel Holub, Gale Bravener, Robert McLaughlin A management-scale investigation of consistent individual differences in behaviour and trapping bias in sea lamprey ( Petromyzon marinus ), Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 79, no.11 (Jan 2022): 97–110.https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2019-0448Jennifer A. Miller Using Spatially Explicit Simulated Data to Analyze Animal Interactions: A Case Study with Brown Hyenas in Northern Botswana, Transactions in GIS 16, no.33 (May 2012): 271–291.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9671.2012.01323.xMatt Grove Logistical mobility reduces subsistence risk in hunting economies, Journal of Archaeological Science 37, no.88 (Aug 2010): 1913–1921.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2010.02.017John M. C. Hutchinson, Peter M. Waser Use, misuse and extensions of "ideal gas" models of animal encounter, Biological Reviews 82, no.33 (Aug 2007): 335–359.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2007.00014.xErik Baatrup, Mark Bayley, Jorgen Aagaard Axelsen Predation of the mite Hypoaspis aculeifer on the springtail Folsomia fimetaria and the influence of sex, size, starvation, and poisoning, Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 118, no.11 (Jan 2006): 61–70.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1570-7458.2006.00357.xJim Muirhead, W. Gary Sprules Reaction distance of Bythotrephes longimanus , encounter rate and index of prey risk for Harp Lake, Ontario, Freshwater Biology 48, no.11 (Dec 2002): 135–146.https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.2003.00986.xSean E. Walker, Samuel D. Marshall, Ann L. Rypstra, Douglus H. Taylor The effects of hunger on locomotory behaviour in two species of wolf spider (Araneae, Lycosidae), Animal Behaviour 58, no.33 (Sep 1999): 515–520.https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1999.1180John A. Byers An encounter rate model of bark beetle populations searching at random for susceptible host trees, Ecological Modelling 91, no.1-31-3 (Nov 1996): 57–66.https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3800(95)00166-2Dana L. Winkelman, Gary L. Vinyard Gyrinid searching tactics: empirical observations and a tactical model, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 28, no.55 (Jun 1991): 345–351.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00164384P. A. Cochran Size-selective attack by parasitic lampreys: consideration of alternate null hypotheses, Oecologia 67, no.11 (Aug 1985): 137–141.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00378465Peter M. Waser ?Chance? and mixed-species associations, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 15, no.33 (Aug 1984): 197–202.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00292975