Abstract

Polyamines are important regulators of basal cellular functions but also subserve highly specific tasks in the mammalian brain. With this respect, polyamines and the synthesizing and degrading enzymes are clearly differentially distributed in neurons versus glial cells and also in different brain areas. The synthesis of the diamine putrescine may be driven via two different pathways. In the “classical” pathway urea and carbon dioxide are removed from arginine by arginase and ornithine decarboxylase. The alternative pathway, first removing carbon dioxide by arginine decarboxlyase and then urea by agmatinase, may serve the same purpose. Furthermore, the intermediate product of the alternative pathway, agmatine, is an endogenous ligand for imidazoline receptors and may serve as a neurotransmitter. In order to evaluate and compare the expression patterns of the two gate keeper enzymes arginase and arginine decarboxylase, we generated polyclonal, monospecific antibodies against arginase-1 and arginine decarboxylase. Using these tools, we immunocytochemically screened the rat brain and compared the expression patterns of both enzymes in several brain areas on the regional, cellular and subcellular level. In contrast to other enzymes of the polyamine pathway, arginine decarboxylase and arginase are both constitutively and widely expressed in rat brain neurons. In cerebral cortex and hippocampus, principal neurons and putative interneurons were clearly labeled for both enzymes. Labeling, however, was strikingly different in these neurons with respect to the subcellular localization of the enzymes. While with antibodies against arginine decarboxylase the immunosignal was distributed throughout the cytoplasm, arginase-like immunoreactivity was preferentially localized to Golgi stacks. Given the apparent congruence of arginase and arginine decarboxylase distribution with respect to certain cell populations, it seems likely that the synthesis of agmatine rather than putrescine may be the main purpose of the alternative pathway of polyamine synthesis, while the classical pathway supplies putrescine and spermidine/spermine in these neurons.

Highlights

  • Polyamines at physiological pH-values are positively charged molecules and interact with nucleic acids and proteins

  • The classical and the alternative pathway for putrescine synthesis are driven by two sets of enzymes, both belonging to the same two protein families, namely the arginase family (Arg, Agm) and the Orn/Lys/Arg decarboxylase class-II family (ODC, arginine decarboxylase (ADC))

  • The C-terminal part of the ADC sequence was chosen for immunization (C-terminal 67 amino acids), showing only 25.4% identity with the C-terminus of rat ornithine decarboxylase (ODC)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Polyamines (putrescine, spermidine and spermine) at physiological pH-values are positively charged molecules and interact with nucleic acids and proteins They are involved in a large variety of biological functions, often linked with cell growth, survival, and proliferation. In the brain they serve a variety of tissue specific roles influencing neuronal excitability by modulating ion channels and receptors [3,4,5,6,7]. They contribute to the complex rectification of Kir channels in retinal Muller cells and enhance propagation of molecules within the glial syncytium [8,9]. Even under pathological conditions like stroke [10,11] epilepsy [12,13], or mental disorders [14,15], the polyamine system is highly responsive

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call