Abstract

Vasarely’s nested squares illusion shows that the corners of concentric squares, arranged in a gradient of increasing or decreasing luminance, generate illusory “corner-folds,” which appear more salient (either brighter or darker) than the adjacent flat (non- corner) regions of each individual square. The Alternating Brightness Star (ABS) illusion, based on Vasarely’s classic nested squares, further shows that the strength of these corner-folds depends on corner angle. Previous psychophysical studies showed the relationship between corner angle and perceived contrast in the ABS illusion to be linear, with sharp angles looking higher in contrast, and shallow angles lower in contrast. Center-surround difference-of-Gaussians (DOG) modeling did not replicate this linear relationship, however, suggesting that a full neural explanation of the nested squares and ABS illusions might be found in the visual cortex, rather than at subcortical stages. Here we recorded the responses from single area V1 neurons in the awake primate, during the presentation of visual stimuli containing illusory corner-folds of various angles. Our results showed stronger neural responses for illusory corner-folds made from sharper than from shallower corners, consistent with predictions from the previous psychophysical work. The relationship between corner angle and strength of the neuronal responses, albeit parametric, was apparently non-linear. This finding was in line with the previous DOG data, but not with the psychophysical data. Our combined results suggest that, whereas corner-fold illusions likely originate from center-surround retinogeniculate processes, their complete neural explanation may be found in extrastriate visual cortical areas.

Highlights

  • ObjectivesOur goal was to quantify the effect of corner angle on neural activity by determining the contrast level along the Edge that produced a neural response of comparable strength to each of the corner-fold midpoints

  • The Alternating Brightness Star (ABS) illusion, which we developed based on Vasarely’s classic nested squares [2], further shows that the strength of the illusion depends on the corner angle, with sharp angles generating “corner-folds” that look higher in contrast, and shallow angles generating “corner-folds” that look lower in contrast (Fig 1C and 1D)

  • We recorded the responses from 118 single V1 neurons from two rhesus macaques (102 neurons from monkey J and 16 neurons from monkey A), during the presentation of brightness illusions based on Vasarely’s ‘nested squares,’ but discarded 60 neurons before analyzing the data because of technical problems

Read more

Summary

Objectives

Our goal was to quantify the effect of corner angle on neural activity by determining the contrast level along the Edge that produced a neural response of comparable strength to each of the corner-fold midpoints

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call