Abstract
Critical studies of ‘lean’ work regimes have tended to focus on the factory shop floor or public and healthcare sectors, despite its recent revival and wider deployment in neoliberal service economies. This paper investigates the politics of the workplace in a United Kingdom automotive dealership group subject to an intervention inspired by lean methods. We develop Foucauldian studies of governmentality by addressing lean as a technology of power deployed to act on the conduct of workers, examining how they debunk, distance themselves from and enact its imperatives. Our findings support critiques of lean work regimes that raise concerns about work intensification and poor worker health. Discourses of professional autonomy allow workers to distance themselves from lean prescriptions, yet they are reaffirmed in their actions. More significantly, we illustrate the exercise of a more encompassing form of power, showing how lean harnesses the inherently exploitable desire for recognition among hitherto marginalised workers, and its role as a form of ‘human capital’. The paper contributes to critical studies of lean by illustrating its subtle, deleterious and persistent effects within the analytical frame of neoliberal governmentality. We also demonstrate how studies of governmentality can be advanced through the analysis of contested social relations on the ground, highlighting the ethico-political potential of Foucauldian work.
Highlights
The automotive industry has historically been at the forefront of efficiency drives to enhance productivity and capital accumulation, from the mass production assembly line of Ford (Wilson & McKinlay, 2010), to the ‘lean production’ regime of the Toyota production system (Ezzamel, Willmott, & Worthington, 2001; Krafcik, 1988)
Critical scrutiny of lean in the automotive industry has focused on the production line and the factory shop floor (Ezzamel et al, 2001; Zanoni, 2011)
This paper investigates an organisational intervention inspired by lean methods in a major United Kingdom dealership over a two-year period
Summary
The automotive industry has historically been at the forefront of efficiency drives to enhance productivity and capital accumulation, from the mass production assembly line of Ford (Wilson & McKinlay, 2010), to the ‘lean production’ regime of the Toyota production system (Ezzamel, Willmott, & Worthington, 2001; Krafcik, 1988). Research in both manufacturing and service sectors demonstrates that lean involves more intensive and centralised control, deskilling, work intensification, low staff morale, poor worker health, and a strengthening of the functions of capital through performance targets, surveillance and teamworking from above (Carter et al, 2014, 2017; Ezzamel et al, 2001; Stewart et al, 2016; Stewart et al, 2009).
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have