Abstract
Religious beliefs play an important role in the study of religious practices and behaviour. Wulff (1997) suggested that there are four basic attitudes towards religion: Literal Affirmation, Literal Disaffirmation, Reductive Interpretation and Restorative Interpretation. Building on this work, Duriez, Soenans and Hutsebaut (2005) constructed the Post-Critical Belief Scale (PCBS). In their work, Duriez at al. conducted a Principal Component Analysis of the responses to this questionnaire. It yielded two factors which partitioned 2-dimensional space into four quadrants corresponding to the four types of beliefs postulated by Wulff (1997). The research question which is addressed in this paper is whether there is an association between scores on the PCBS and religious practices and behaviour in a staunchly Catholic country like Malta where over 98% are baptized in the Roman Catholic Church. This question was addressed by administering a questionnaire to a random sample of 650 students at the University of Malta, of which 421 completed the questionnaire. Of those who answered the questionnaire, 349 were undergraduates. The questionnaire consisted of a number of questions about religious attitudes and behaviour, and also included the PCBS. The analysis of the association between membership of one of the four belief typologies and the participants’ responses to other questions related to religious beliefs, religious practice and sexual norms was carried out using Discriminant Analysis. The results indicate that, at least in this sample of Maltese university students, these three measures do a reasonably good job in identifying membership in three of Wulff’s four belief typologies.
Highlights
One of the most studied question in the psychology of religion is persons’ perceptions of religion and religious beliefs
As in previous research (e.g., Duriez et al, 2004), and as we did in Lauri et al (2009), a level of acquiescence estimation was subtracted from the raw scores, after which a Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was performed
Interpretation” category; those who had a positive score on INCLUSION but a negative score on SYMBOLIC (HI/LS) were placed in the Literal Affirmation category; and those respondents who had a negative score on both INCLUSION and SYMBOLIC (LI/LS) were placed in the Literal Disaffirmation category
Summary
One of the most studied question in the psychology of religion is persons’ perceptions of religion and religious beliefs (for example Bateson, 1993; Argyle, 2000; Fontaine et al, 2003). Wulff postulated that attitudes towards religion can be classified along two dimensions, the Inclusion vs Exclusion of Transcendence dimension and the Literal vs Symbolic Dimension He suggested that attitudes towards religion can be understood by taking into consideration these two important dimensions. The first dimension describes whether people accept the existence of God or some other transcendental being or whether they live by other guiding principles such as, for example, science. This dimension captures the extent of the religiosity or spirituality of the person. According to Wulff, these two dimensions, Inclusion vs Exclusion of Transcendence and the Literal vs Symbolic dimension, describe the experience of religion and religious beliefs in a person’s life.
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have