Are Services Better for Climate Change?
Embodied greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and their structure of inducement by the supply-chain networks of 480 goods and services in the United States are analyzed for 44 GHGs. Producing a dollar of a product or service generates an average of 0.36 kg of CO2 equivalent GHGs onsite, increasing to 0.83 kg when supply-chain-induced emissions are taken into account. Services produce less than 5% of total U.S. GHG emissions directly, and their direct GHG emission intensities per dollar output are much less (0.04 kg C02 equiv/dollars) than those of physical products, even when supply-chain-induced emissions are included (0.47 kg C02 equiv/dollars). When both supply-chain effects and the volume of household expenditures are taken into account, however, household consumption of services excluding electric utilities and transportation services proves to be responsible for 37.6% of total industrial GHG emissions in the United States, almost twice the amount due to household consumption of electric utility and transportation services. Given the current structure of GHG emissions, a shift to a service-oriented economy is shown to entail a decrease in GHG emission intensity per unit GDP but an increase, by necessity, in overall GHG emissions in absolute terms. The results are discussed in the context of U.S. climate change policy.
- Research Article
2
- 10.1016/j.oneear.2021.11.008
- Dec 1, 2021
- One Earth
Major US electric utility climate pledges have the potential to collectively reduce power sector emissions by one-third
- Research Article
49
- 10.1186/s12711-019-0459-5
- Apr 29, 2019
- Genetics, Selection, Evolution : GSE
BackgroundSocietal pressures exist to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from farm animals, especially in beef cattle. Both total GHG and GHG emissions per unit of product decrease as productivity increases. Limitations of previous studies on GHG emissions are that they generally describe feed intake inadequately, assess the consequences of selection on particular traits only, or examine consequences for only part of the production chain. Here, we examine GHG emissions for the whole production chain, with the estimated cost of carbon included as an extra cost on traits in the breeding objective of the production system.MethodsWe examined an example beef production system where economic merit was measured from weaning to slaughter. The estimated cost of the carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2-e) associated with feed intake change is included in the economic values calculated for the breeding objective traits and comes in addition to the cost of the feed associated with trait change. GHG emission effects on the production system are accumulated over the breeding objective traits, and the reduction in GHG emissions is evaluated, for different carbon prices, both for the individual animal and the production system.ResultsMultiple-trait selection in beef cattle can reduce total GHG and GHG emissions per unit of product while increasing economic performance if the cost of feed in the breeding objective is high. When carbon price was $10, $20, $30 and $40/ton CO2-e, selection decreased total GHG emissions by 1.1, 1.6, 2.1 and 2.6% per generation, respectively. When the cost of feed for the breeding objective was low, selection reduced total GHG emissions only if carbon price was high (~ $80/ton CO2-e). Ignoring the costs of GHG emissions when feed cost was low substantially increased emissions (e.g. 4.4% per generation or ~ 8.8% in 10 years).ConclusionsThe ability to reduce GHG emissions in beef cattle depends on the cost of feed in the breeding objective of the production system. Multiple-trait selection will reduce emissions, while improving economic performance, if the cost of feed in the breeding objective is high. If it is low, greater growth will be favoured, leading to an increase in GHG emissions that may be undesirable.
- Research Article
4
- 10.3168/jds.2024-25874
- May 1, 2025
- Journal of dairy science
In 2022, New York (NY) had over 620 000 dairy cows producing more than 7 million Mg (15 billion lb) of milk, ranking fifth in dairy producing states in the United States. The objectives of this work were to (1) estimate total farm-gate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and GHG emission intensity (GHGei) of 36 medium to large (>300 mature cows) commercial NY dairies, (2) determine the contribution of main GHGs (on-farm methane [CH4], nitrous oxide [N2O], and carbon dioxide [CO2], plus embedded emissions [CO2 equivalents; CO2eq]) and sources (enteric fermentation, feed production, manure management, grazing, fuel and energy) to farm-gate GHGei, and (3) identify key performance indicators (KPIs) driving farm-gate GHGei. Assessments were done for 2022 using The Cool Farm Tool. Farm size ranged from 345 to 6 350 head of predominantly Holstein cows with animal densities between 1.76 and 4.85 animal units ha-1 (0.71 to 1.96 AU ac-1) and heifer to cow ratios between 0.02 and 0.49. Herds produced an average fat and protein corrected milk (FPCM) yield of 12.7 Mg (29 000 lb) FPCM cow-1 per year using 64% homegrown feed. Total FPCM production was 873 000 Mg (1.92 billion lb), representing approximately 12% of total NY milk production in 2022. The GHGei ranged from 0.63 to 1.06 kg CO2eq kg FPCM-1 (mean GHGei = 0.86kg CO2eq kg FPCM-1). Methane was the biggest contributor, accounting for 60% of total GHG emissions on average, with enteric CH4 as the largest contributor (45% of total farm emissions). Among farms, feed production emissions accounted for about 25%, with approximately 7% from homegrown feed production. Manure management practices accounted for about 20% of emissions and explained the largest amount of variation in GHGei among farms. Potential KPIs for GHGei included manure management system, heifer to cow ratio, herd feed consumption intensity, percentage of homegrown feed, and crop nutrient source (fertilizer versus manure). Emission intensity reflected the high proportion of good quality homegrown feed, careful nutrient management and use of manure treatment systems (covered liquid slurry storages, anaerobic digesters) on several dairies. The influence of replacement rate and heifer to cow ratio on animal density, herd feed consumption intensity, and subsequent GHGei requires more detailed analysis. The farms in this study represent a considerable proportion of NY's 2022 FPCM production. Greater participation by smaller farms is necessary to draw conclusions for NY's dairy industry as a whole.
- Research Article
44
- 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.046
- May 10, 2011
- Animal Feed Science and Technology
A whole farm systems analysis of greenhouse gas emissions of 60 Tasmanian dairy farms
- Research Article
126
- 10.1111/gcb.15290
- Sep 2, 2020
- Global Change Biology
Balancing crop production and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from agriculture soil requires a better understanding and quantification of crop GHG emissions intensity, a measure of GHG emissions per unit crop production. Here we conduct a state-of-the-art estimate of the spatial-temporal variability of GHG emissions intensities for wheat, maize, and rice in China from 1949 to 2012 using an improved agricultural ecosystem model (Dynamic Land Ecosystem Model-Agriculture Version 2.0) and meta-analysis covering 172 field-GHG emissions experiments. The results show that the GHG emissions intensities of these croplands from 1949 to 2012, on average, were 0.10-1.31kgCO2 -eq/kg, with a significant increase rate of 1.84-3.58×10-3 kgCO2 -eqkg-1 year-1 . Nitrogen fertilizer was the dominant factor contributing to the increase in GHG emissions intensity in northern China and increased its impact in southern China in the 2000s. Increasing GHG emissions intensity implies that excessive fertilizer failed to markedly stimulate crop yield increase in China but still exacerbated soil GHG emissions. This study found that overfertilization of more than 60% was mainly located in the winter wheat-summer maize rotation systems in the North China Plain, the winter wheat-rice rotation systems in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River and southwest China, and most of the double rice systems in the South. Our simulations suggest that roughly a one-third reduction in the current N fertilizer application level over these "overfertilization" regions would not significantly influence crop yield but decrease soil GHG emissions by 29.60%-32.50% and GHG emissions intensity by 0.13-0.25kgCO2 -eq/kg. This reduction is about 29% and 5% of total agricultural soil GHG emissions in China and the world, respectively. This study suggests that improving nitrogen use efficiency would be an effective strategy to mitigate GHG emissions and sustain China's food security.
- Research Article
15
- 10.3390/su14159144
- Jul 26, 2022
- Sustainability
Rationale: Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from crop agriculture are of great concern in the context of changing climatic conditions; however, in most cases, data based on lifecycle assessments are not available for grain yield variations or the carbon footprint of maize. The current study aimed to determine net carbon emissions and sequestration for maize grown in Bangladesh. Methods: The static closed-chamber technique was used to determine total GHG emissions using data on GHG emissions from maize fields and secondary sources for inputs. A secondary source for regional yield data was used in the current study. GHG emission intensity is defined as the ratio of total emissions to grain yield. The net GHG emission/carbon sequestration was determined by subtracting total GHG emissions (CO2 eq.) from net primary production (NPP). Results: Grain yields varied from 1590 to 9300 kg ha−1 in the wet season and from 680 to 11,820 kg ha−1 in the dry season. GHG emission intensities were 0.53–2.21 and 0.37–1.70 kg CO2 eq. kg−1 grain in the wet and dry seasons, respectively. In Bangladesh, the total estimated GHG emissions were 1.66–4.09 million tonnes (MT) CO2 eq. from 2015 to 2020, whereas the net total CO2 sequestration was 1.51–3.91 MT. The net CO2 sequestration rates were 984.3–5757.4 kg ha−1 in the wet season and 1188.62–5757.39 kg ha−1 in the dry season. This study observed spatial variations in carbon emissions and sequestration depending on growing seasons. In the rice–maize pattern, maize sequestered about 1.23 MT CO2 eq. per year−1, but rice emitted about 0.16 MT CO2 eq. per year−1. This study showed potential spatiotemporal variations in carbon footprints. Recommendation: Special care is needed to improve maize grain yields in the wet season. Fertiliser and water use efficiencies need to be improved to minimise GHG emissions under changing climatic conditions. Efforts to increase the area under cultivation with rice–maize or other non-rice crop-based cropping systems are needed to augment CO2 sequestration. The generation of a regional data bank on carbon footprints would be beneficial for combating the impact of climate change.
- Research Article
35
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139504
- Nov 2, 2023
- Journal of Cleaner Production
Carbon pricing and firms’ GHG emissions: Firm-level empirical evidence from East Asia
- Research Article
162
- 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.047
- May 6, 2011
- Animal Feed Science and Technology
Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from beef production in western Canada – Evaluation using farm-based life cycle assessment
- Research Article
36
- 10.1071/an12061
- Aug 2, 2012
- Animal Production Science
The Australian dairy industry contributes ~1.6% of the nation’s greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, emitting an estimated 9.3 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2e) per annum. This study examined 41 contrasting Australian dairy farms for their GHG emissions using the Dairy Greenhouse Gas Abatement Strategies calculator, which incorporates Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and Australian inventory methodologies, algorithms and emission factors. Sources of GHG emissions included were pre-farm embedded emissions associated with key farm inputs (i.e. grains and concentrates, forages and fertilisers), CO2 emissions from electricity and fuel consumption, methane emissions from enteric fermentation and animal waste management, and nitrous oxide emissions from animal waste management and nitrogen fertilisers. The estimated mean (±s.d.) GHG emissions intensity was 1.04 ± 0.17 kg CO2 equivalents/kg of fat and protein-corrected milk (kg CO2e/kg FPCM). Enteric methane emissions were found to be approximately half of total farm emissions. Linear regression analysis showed that 95% of the variation in total farm GHG emissions could be explained by annual milk production. While the results of this study suggest that milk production alone could be a suitable surrogate for estimating GHG emissions for national inventory purposes, the GHG emissions intensity of milk production, on an individual farm basis, was shown to vary by over 100% (0.76–1.68 kg CO2e/kg FPCM). It is clear that using a single emissions factor, such as milk production alone, to estimate any given individual farm’s GHG emissions, has the potential to either substantially under- or overestimate individual farms’ GHG emissions.
- Research Article
187
- 10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.03.032
- Aug 23, 2011
- Applied Energy
Life-cycle analysis on energy consumption and GHG emission intensities of alternative vehicle fuels in China
- Research Article
59
- 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106452
- Oct 3, 2019
- Building and Environment
The impact of value engineering on embodied greenhouse gas emissions in the built environment: A hybrid life cycle assessment
- Research Article
60
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126338
- Feb 10, 2021
- Journal of Cleaner Production
Variations of GHG emission patterns from waste disposal processes in megacity Shanghai from 2005 to 2015
- Research Article
4
- 10.1071/an15608
- Jun 8, 2016
- Animal Production Science
Previous studies of greenhouse gas emissions (GHGE) from beef production systems in northern Australia have been based on models of ‘steady-state’ herd structures that do not take into account the considerable inter-annual variation in liveweight gain, reproduction and mortality rates that occurs due to seasonal conditions. Nor do they consider the implications of flexible stocking strategies designed to adapt these production systems to the highly variable climate. The aim of the present study was to quantify the variation in total GHGE (t CO2e) and GHGE intensity (t CO2e/t liveweight sold) for the beef industry in northern Australia when variability in these factors was considered. A combined GRASP–Enterprise modelling platform was used to simulate a breeding–finishing beef cattle property in the Burdekin River region of northern Queensland, using historical climate data from 1982–2011. GHGE was calculated using the method of Australian National Greenhouse Gas Inventory. Five different stocking-rate strategies were simulated with fixed stocking strategies at moderate and high rates, and three flexible stocking strategies where the stocking rate was adjusted annually by up to 5%, 10% or 20%, according to pasture available at the end of the growing season. Variation in total annual GHGE was lowest in the ‘fixed moderate’ (~9.5 ha/adult equivalent (AE)) stocking strategy, ranging from 3799 to 4471 t CO2e, and highest in the ‘fixed high’ strategy (~5.9 ha/AE), which ranged from 3771 to 7636 t CO2e. The ‘fixed moderate’ strategy had the least variation in GHGE intensity (15.7–19.4 t CO2e/t liveweight sold), while the ‘flexible 20’ strategy (up to 20% annual change in AE) had the largest range (10.5–40.8 t CO2e/t liveweight sold). Across the five stocking strategies, the ‘fixed moderate’ stocking-rate strategy had the highest simulated perennial grass percentage and pasture growth, highest average rate of liveweight gain (121 kg/steer), highest average branding percentage (74%) and lowest average breeding-cow mortality rate (3.9%), resulting in the lowest average GHGE intensity (16.9 t CO2e/t liveweight sold). The ‘fixed high’ stocking rate strategy (~5.9 ha/AE) performed the poorest in each of these measures, while the three flexible stocking strategies were intermediate. The ‘fixed moderate’ stocking strategy also yielded the highest average gross margin per AE carried and per hectare. These results highlight the importance of considering the influence of climate variability on stocking-rate management strategies and herd performance when estimating GHGE. The results also support a body of previous work that has recommended the adoption of moderate stocking strategies to enhance the profitability and ecological stability of beef production systems in northern Australia.
- Conference Article
1
- 10.36334/modsim.2013.b2.harrison
- Dec 1, 2013
Livestock are by far the greatest contributor to Australian agricultural greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and are projected to account for 72% of total agricultural emissions by 2020. This necessitates the development of GHG mitigation strategies from the livestock sector. Currently there are many research streams investigating the efficacy of GHG mitigation technologies, though most are at the individual animal level. Here we examine the effect of a promising animal-scale intervention - increasing ewe fecundity - on GHG emissions at the whole farm scale. This approach accounts for seasonal climatic influences on farm productivity and the dynamic interactions between variables. The study used a biophysical model and was based on real data from a property in south-eastern Australia that currently runs a self-replacing prime lamb enterprise. The breeding flock was a composite cross-bred genotype segregating for the FecB gene (after the 'fecundity Booroola' trait observed in Australian Merinos), with typical lambing rates of 150-200% lambs per ewe. Lambs were born in mid-winter (July) and were weaned and sold at 18 weeks of age at the beginning of summer (December). Livestock continuously grazed pastures of phalaris, cocksfoot and subterranean clover and were supplied with barley grain as supplementary feed in seasons when pasture biomass availability was low. Biophysical variables including pasture phenology and flock dynamics were simulated on a daily time-step using the model GrassGro with historical weather data from 1970 to 2012. Whole farm GHG emissions were computed with GrassGro outputs and methodology from the Australian National Greenhouse Accounts Inventory (DCCEE, 2012). Increasing ewe fecundity from 1.0 lamb per ewe at birth (equivalent to scanning rates at pregnancy of 80% of ewes with single lambs, 17% with twins and 3% empty) to 1.5 (scanning rates of 20% ewes with singles, 51% with twins, 26% with triplets and 3% empty as observed at the property) reduced mean emissions intensity from 9.3 to 7.3 t CO2-equivalents/t animal product and GHG emissions per animal sold by 32%. Increasing fecundity reduced average lamb sale liveweight from 42 to 40 kg, but this was offset by an increase in annual sheep sales from 8 to 12 head/ha and an increase in average annual meat production from 410 to 540 kg liveweight/ha. A key benefit associated with increasing sheep fecundity is the ability to increase enterprise productivity whilst remaining environmentally sustainable. For the same long-term average annual stocking rate as an enterprise running genotypes with lower fecundity, it was shown that genotypes with high fecundity such as those on the property could either increase meat and wool productivity from 449 to 571 kg/ha (clean fleece weight plus liveweight at sale) with little change in net GHG emissions, or reduce net GHG emissions from 4.1 to 3.2 t CO2-equivalents/ha for similar average annual farm productivity. In either case, GHG emissions intensity was reduced by about 2.1 t CO2-equivalents/t animal product. From a methodological perspective, this study revealed that differences in computing the relative effect of increased fecundity on total farm production, GHG emissions or emissions intensity either within or across years were relatively small. For example, the mean difference in emissions intensity of an enterprise obtaining 1.5 lambs per ewe relative to an enterprise obtaining 1.0 lamb per ewe computed within years was -25%, whereas the relative difference in mean emissions intensity across years was -27%. Such findings justify the traditional approach of previous GHG mitigation studies which compare differences (e.g. abatement potential) between values averaged across multiple-year simulation runs, as opposed to the method of computing the differences between intervention strategies within years then comparing the average difference.
- Research Article
3
- 10.32508/stdjelm.v6i1.802
- Jan 1, 2022
- Science & Technology Development Journal - Economics - Law and Management
This research aims to evaluate the relationship between greenhouse gas emissions and economic growth [measured by GDP (gross domestics product) and GDP per capital] in Vietnam. The authors used the data compiled from the WB (word bank) database and time series estimation method. The results from models show that the factors affecting the intensity of CO2 emissions in Vietnam are statistically significant, at 1%, 5% and 10%, with the impact level of emission intensity (with a lag of 2 ) at -0.48; economic growth rate at 29180.49 (with a lag of 1); and the square of economic growth rate at - 14588.66 (with a lag of 1), with the model's explanatory level of 56.54%. In addition, the coefficient of the quadratic function is negative, illustrated by a downward curve in the graph representing the relationship between economic growth and emissions, reflecting correctly the environmental Kuznet curve. At the same time, the figures of Granger Causality Tests reveal that there is a causal relationship between the economic growth rate and the intensity of CO2 greenhouse gas emissions in Vietnam during the research period, with a significance level of 5. %. Economic growth exacerbates the intensity of greenhouse gas (CO2) emissions, and this increase has a return effect on growth (positive effect). However, with the square of economic growth rate doubling, this relationship will tend to be negative. On the basis of the analysis results, the study also proposes some policy implications which reduce the intensity of greenhouse gas emissions and aim to promote green growth in Vietnam: (1) reducing emission sources in economic fields: industry, agriculture, services; (2) reducing the use of fossil energy which should be replaced by Renewable energy (energy from wind and solar); (3) applying modern science and technology in production and economic activities; (4) completing the legal framework to encourage economic sectors and businesses to use natural resources effectively; (5) The Government should enact policies to encourage all economic sectors to apply modern technology in production.