Abstract

This study uses Canadian mutual fund data from 2005 to 2020 to compare fund flows of bank managed mutual funds with those of non-bank managed mutual funds. We document that relative to non-bank funds, bank funds consistently exhibit lower flows on a monthly basis. Moreover, bank funds demonstrate lower flow-sensitivity to performance than non-bank funds. Further investigation reveals this effect is driven largely by lower outflows following poor performance, as it appears that these investors are trusting of fund managers enough to stay the investment course. We further separate the data into equity, bond, and balanced funds and find that the flow difference between bank and non-bank funds is largest in equity funds, smaller in balanced funds, but non-existent in bond funds. Finally, we document that this effect is dramatically weakening over our sample period. Our study has meaningful implications for regulators, fund investors, banks, as well as mutual fund managers.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call