Abstract

In coding and information theory, it is desirable to construct maximal codes that can be either variable length codes or error control codes of fixed length. However deciding code maximality boils down to deciding whether a given NFA is universal, and this is a hard problem (including the case of whether the NFA accepts all words of a fixed length). On the other hand, it is acceptable to know whether a code is ‘approximately’ maximal, which then boils down to whether a given NFA is ‘approximately’ universal. Here we introduce the notion of a (1−ε)-universal automaton and present polynomial randomized approximation algorithms to test NFA universality and related hard automata problems, for certain natural probability distributions on the set of words. We also conclude that the randomization aspect is necessary, as approximate universality remains hard for any fixed polynomially computable ε.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call