Abstract

The nature and timing of rice domestication and the development of rice cultivation in South Asia is much debated. In northern South Asia there is presently a significant gap (c.4200 years) between earliest evidence for the exploitation of wild rice (Lahuradewa c.6000 BCE) and earliest dated evidence for the utilisation of fully domesticated rice (Mahagara c.1800 BCE). The Indus Civilisation (c.3000–1500 BCE) developed and declined during the intervening period, and there has been debate about whether rice was adopted and exploited by Indus populations during this ‘gap’. This paper presents new analysis of spikelet bases and weeds collected from three Indus Civilisation settlements in north-west India, which provide insight into the way that rice was exploited. This analysis suggests that starting in the period before the Indus urban phase (Early Harappan) and continuing through the urban (Mature Harappan/Harappan), post-urban (Late Harappan) and on into the post-Indus Painted Grey Ware (PGW) period, there was a progressive increase in the proportion of domesticated-type spikelet bases and a decrease in wild-types. This pattern fits with a model of the slow development of rice exploitation from wild foraging to agriculture involving full cultivation. Importantly, the accompanying weeds show no increased proportions of wetland species during this period. Instead a mix of wetland and dryland species was identified, and although these data are preliminary, they suggest that the development of an independent rice tradition may have been intertwined with the practices of the eastern most Indus peoples. These data also suggest that when fully domesticated Oryza sativa ssp. japonica was introduced around 2000 BCE, it arrived in an area that was already familiar with domesticated rice cultivation and a range of cultivation techniques.

Highlights

  • Since the rediscovery of South Asia’s Indus Civilisation (c.3000-1500 BC) (Figure 1, Table1) in the early 1900s, the nature of the agricultural practices used by Indus populations has been a source of speculation (e.g. Mackay 1931; Wheeler 1953; Fairservis 1961, 1967)

  • First it will outline the history of rice in South Asia, and it will review how the Indus Civilisation fits into this debate, before presenting the new evidence and assessing its significance

  • We suggest that the debates over rice in South Asia need to be separated into two issues in future analyses, the untangling of the complex issue of the domestication of O.nivara to O.sativa ssp. indica in northern South Asia from the issues related to the development of rice agriculture

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Since the rediscovery of South Asia’s Indus Civilisation (c.3000-1500 BC) (Figure 1, Table1) in the early 1900s, the nature of the agricultural practices used by Indus populations has been a source of speculation (e.g. Mackay 1931; Wheeler 1953; Fairservis 1961, 1967). This paper contributes new evidence to the Indus rice debate by presenting an analysis of archaeobotanical data collected from three settlement sites in the most easterly part of the area occupied by Indus populations First it will outline the history of rice in South Asia, and it will review how the Indus Civilisation fits into this debate, before presenting the new evidence and assessing its significance. Using a combination of genetics, the modern distribution of wild rice species, and archaeological evidence, Fuller (2002, 2005, 2006, 2011; Fuller and Weisskopf 2011) has suggested that one of these domestication events may potentially have taken place in the Ganges region of India. Based on what is available, Fuller (2011: 82) has proposed that the “independent rice tradition in north India [...] never [...] proceeded on its own to full domestication” until the arrival of O.sativa ssp

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.