Abstract

This paper proposes a model of student support based on student goals and strengths, rather than addressing their weaknesses. It argues that Hope Theory can be used in education as it has been used in counselling to assist students to develop goal setting and a sense of agency by building on their strengths. It suggests that careful curriculum design and engaged learning are essential to building hope and eventual learning success; and that this can be achieved through ongoing collaboration between professional and academic staff. While acknowledging the limitations of a convenience sample, it presents a case study of a single first year course with an enrolment of 250 students.

Highlights

  • This paper proposes a model of student support based on student goals and strengths, rather than addressing their weaknesses

  • The Australian Government has announced its ambition for growth in higher education attainment, aiming for 40% of all 25 to 34 year olds to hold a qualification at bachelor level or above by 2025 (Bradley, Noonan, Nugent, & Scales, 2008), and has established as a priority the transformation of access to higher education by students from low socio economic backgrounds (Commonwealth of Australia, 2009)

  • Students arriving at the University of Newcastle (UoN), Australia, seem increasingly to be overwhelmed by what faces them, rather than excited by new opportunities and interesting challenges

Read more

Summary

Transforming higher education

The Australian Government has announced its ambition for growth in higher education attainment, aiming for 40% of all 25 to 34 year olds to hold a qualification at bachelor level or above by 2025 (Bradley, Noonan, Nugent, & Scales, 2008), and has established as a priority the transformation of access to higher education by students from low socio economic backgrounds (Commonwealth of Australia, 2009) Criticisms of these changes and predictions of their outcomes have been expressed in both the popular and academic press (Bosanquet, 2009; Hare, & Ross, 2012; Massaro, 2009; Meyers, 2012). They argue that more effective approaches to student retention and success should be based on working with students’ strengths

Nurturing hope for student success
Supporting hope
Findings
Case study
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.