Abstract

BackgroundMagnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) is an imaging technique used to measure metabolic changes in the tissue. Due to the lack of evidence, MRS is not a priority in diagnosing neurodegenerative diseases because it is a relatively specialized technique that requires specialized equipment and expertise to perform and interpret. This systematic review aimed to present a comprehensive collection of MRS results in the most common neurodegenerative diseases. MethodsA systematic search of four electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect) was conducted for studies published from 2017 to 2022. Articles that provided specific biomarker levels were selected, and studies that assessed the diseases via treatment, featured MRS applying nuclei other than 1H, or compared different animal models were excluded. ResultsA total of 25 articles, plus 3 articles for extra information in the introduction, were included in this review. Six of the most common neurodegenerative diseases, i.e., Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease, Huntington chorea, ataxia, multiple sclerosis (MS), multiple system atrophy (MSA), and progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) were examined via MRS. The changes and ratios of N-acetylaspartate (NAA) could be seen in all of these disorders, which could lead to early diagnosis. However, there are other biomarkers, such as Cr and Chon, which can give convincing results. DiscussionThis observational study is the first synthesis of the latest evidence proving metabolic changes during neurodegenerative diseases using MRS as a diagnosis method. The findings indicate decreased N-acetylaspartate (NAA) and NAA/Cr ratios in Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson's disease (PD), ataxias, and MS, reflecting neuronal loss or dysfunction. Increased choline and myo-inositol were noted in some studies, suggesting cell membrane turnover and neuroinflammation. Findings were less consistent for other metabolites like glutamate and gamma-aminobutyric acid. However, there were limitations due to the lack of studies on the same volumes of interest (VOIs) and the small number of participants.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call